The PAYWALL

It seems that information has become equated with money. Join this, pay that. If you don’t, well, you lose. I can’t quite seem to reconcile it in my mind or my heart. There are several issues at hand here.

The first being that, my internet provider is Xfinity. They are pretty good, stable and we get all the TV we want, however, just the other day, last week to be exact, I tried to get on to KGRAradio.com. It didn’t matter which browsers I used, Edge, Chrome, or Fire Fox, or which machine I used, desk top, surface, or phone, I got the same message. After tweeting it, and finding others with Xfinity had the same problem, I decided to perform and experiment and turn off the wifi in my phone, went through sprint, and connected right up.   AHEM.

Really, AHEM!

So this is a sneaky, sneaky way of limiting what you can and cannot see.

REALLY

And, well, I’m furious.     REALLY

So Xfinity is in bed with whom? And how far will this kind of sneaky limiting of our ability to receive and enjoy media go???   Hmmmmmmm?

 

Then there is the Youtube debacle. Those idiots over there are going to algorithm themselves into obscurity. And none too soon, IMO. However there is this little matter of the video format that we all know and use so much and so well. And really, there is not another one in sight that works as well, or hasn’t been bought from the inside out.

 

Which brings me to the next problem, THE PAYWALL (said with echo, echo, echo)

Two things happen here, one, youtube can create a mess for anybody for any reason, any time their black little hearts desire. I suppose that might come with a few greased palms and grift on the side if you know the right people, and they can, for any reason, shut people down.

To avoid this little glitch, honest people either put their second hour with what could be algorithm awakening information in it, behind a PAYWALL, or they remove themselves from you tube altogether. I can’t say I blame them. Then information begins to cost. Who knew that information would become the hottest commodity out there?

I am sure the people who planned this whole hornets’ nest did. They certainly have me over a barrel. I can’t pay. Half the people I have listened to and followed over the years are now behind a paywall. This limits my information in a very big way. Those like Coast to Coast, and Fade to Black are free, if you listen at the time of the broadcast, something that is impossible for me to do, so I miss them. And now, it has worked out that everything I like has become too expensive for me to enjoy and learn from.

I am really sad about this.

I suppose I will just go along, and watch the half ass things that you tube throws at me these days, and once again crawl into my cave where I used to live. It was fun while it lasted. What a way to stop a growing movement of people connecting to each other!

I should have known already.

Advertisements

Modern Mystics: the Experiencer Scientists

Mystic:

ORIGIN

Middle English (in the sense ‘mystical meaning’): from Old French mystique, or via Latin from Greek mustikos, from mustēs ‘initiated person’ from muein ‘close the eyes or lips’, also ‘initiate’. The current sense of the noun dates from the late 17th century. From mystes “one who has been initiated”   From <https://www.etymonline.com/word/mystic>

 

Philosopher scientist: when you go to look up this term, there are no proper definitions listed, as if there is an effort to wipe out, erase the knowledge of such men and how their minds worked. A philosopher scientist was a person who was guided by the intuition and knowledge that the world didn’t end at the physical that explored how both worlds, physical and nonphysical interacted. These men were by definition, mystics. A mystic is a person who peers into the unseen on purpose with the intent of learning and finding out how it interacts with the world. This is called Cross-Disciplinary research/thinking, the very opposite of a specialty-within-a-specialty, like todays view of science and provides a much greater understanding of the bigger picture. Today’s science is much like the ‘Three Blind Men and the Elephant’ in that each one of those blind men were correct, but they couldn’t perceive the whole elephant.

This is exactly what most of the leading thinkers are beginning to understand as they see the convergence of data happening, not only in the phenomenal/spiritual aspects of study but the scientific rational areas dovetailing one into the other.

In an excellent interview about Dr. Jeffery Kripal’s new book, Gordon White talks with Dr. Kripal about :

The Flip: Epiphanies of Mind and the Future of Knowledge Paperback – March 12, 2019 by Jeffrey J. Kripal (Author)

From <https://www.amazon.com/Flip-Epiphanies-Mind-Future-Knowledge/dp/1942658524>

 

A “flip,” writes Jeffrey J. Kripal, is “a reversal of perspective,” “a new real,” often born of an extreme, life-changing experience. The Flip is Kripal’s ambitious, visionary program for unifying the sciences and the humanities to expand our minds, open our hearts, and negotiate a peaceful resolution to the culture wars. Combining accounts of rationalists’ spiritual awakenings and consciousness explorations by philosophers, neuroscientists, and mystics within a framework of the history of science and religion, Kripal compellingly signals a path to mending our fractured world.

Jeffrey J. Kripal holds the J. Newton Rayzor Chair in Philosophy and Religious Thought at Rice University and is the associate director of the Center for Theory and Research at the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California. He has previously taught at Harvard Divinity School and Westminster College and is the author of eight books, including The Flip. He lives in Houston, Texas. From <https://www.amazon.com/Flip-Epiphanies-Mind-Future-Knowledge/dp/1942658524>

In this interview with Gordon, it is evident that Dr. Kripal has a deep grasp of what Steiner wrote about when he talked about how there was a danger involved in scientism overtaking the world and the 8th circle becoming a new fake reality by dint of losing the ability to see beyond the physical. (they do not talk about Steiner – but there is a huge parallel – see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EbntOIYdPM&t=4s)

Dr Kripal does, however talk about the wildly mystical adventures of hard core scientists that have led them to major discoveries and how these experiences create a ‘Flip’ in their world view. What I love about this interview is Gordon’s insistence on an even wider perspective than just ET’s or the like. To him, this is a cross-cultural, cross disciplinary, anthropological, scientific, ethnographical, magical rediscovery of the seen and unseen in the academic community.

 

So too does Rey Hernandez with Jeffery Mishlove. Rey’s new book is:

Beyond UFOs: The Science of Consciousness & Contact with Non Human Intelligence (Volume 1) Paperback – July 22, 2018

by Reinerio Hernandez J.D. (Author), Rudy Schild PH.D. (Author), Jon Klimo PH.D. (Author)

From <https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-UFOs-Science-Consciousness-Intelligence/dp/1721088652/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=beyond+ufo%27s&qid=1554994383&s=books&sr=1-1>

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study. Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology. Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology. The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From <https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-UFOs-Science-Consciousness-Intelligence/dp/1721088652/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=beyond+ufo%27s&qid=1554994383&s=books&sr=1-1>

In a recent interview, New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove Published on Apr 10, 2019, Rey Hernandez, JD, cofounder of the Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research on Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experience (FREE), editor of and contributor to the anthology, Beyond UFOs: The Science of Consciousness and Contact with Non Human Intelligence, Volume 1; Rey describes a series of remarkable experiences in his own life involving remarkable healing, non-human entities, and UFOs. These led him to develop the hypothesis that a variety of “contact modalities”, usually considered distinct phenomena, are all related. These include shamanic journeys, out of body experiences, ghosts and spirits, UFO, remote viewing, channeling, and mystical states of consciousness. These visionary experiences led him to contact astronaut Edgar Mitchell and subsequently create the new organization, FREE. From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ckk8xO_wbE>

In this interview, we get to hear Rey say basically the same thing as Dr. Kripal. Granted, these are two academics – but they both have had their own “Flip” experience. Rey’s lead to a world study and data base detailing findings that prove the validity of Dr. Kripal’s book ‘The Flip”.

Everywhere I turn recently I am finding more and more researchers that have had the ‘look at the bigger picture’ download. We even have this term ‘download’ that doesn’t apply to a computer anymore, but to an ‘anomalous’ phenomena concerning information ‘placed’ within a person’s consciousness by unknown intelligence. What that intelligence might be is most vividly discussed by Gordon White, who IMO, has very creatively evicted his mind out of the common thinking box and into a world of glorious unknowns, exploring with the greatest aplomb and intelligence that I have seen in a very long while.

There are others who are catching on – Grant Cameron with his theory of “WOW”! , and his recent speaking program titled Contact Modalities. I laughed when he said he thought that no UFO really needed lights on the craft and that the only reason they had them was to attract our attention! – theory of WOW! All of his research on right and left brain functioning, how to get contact by shutting off the monkey mind, creative people, artists and musicians, autism, split personality and the attendant DNA change that has been scientifically documented in one body according which personality is present. If I’m not mistaken Grant has also proven this happens with channelers too.

The weight of the evidence pointing to my little wittitude of years back: Consciousness IS the Unified Field is rapidly becoming un-ignorable. On all fronts and in all disciplines, there is a thread, a connection to consciousness. From ancient priests to scientist-philosophers to experiencer-scientists of today. Which brings me to Diana Pasulka.

Diana Pasulka’s new book is amazing, her view point erudite and eye opening from an academic point of view, especially from the religious studies genre.

American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology Hardcover – February 20, 2019  by D.W. Pasulka (Author)

More than half of American adults and more than seventy-five percent of young Americans believe in intelligent extraterrestrial life. This level of belief rivals that of belief in God. American Cosmic examines the mechanisms at work behind the thriving belief system in extraterrestrial life, a system that is changing and even supplanting traditional religions.

Over the course of a six-year ethnographic study, D.W. Pasulka interviewed successful and influential scientists, professionals, and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who believe in extraterrestrial intelligence, thereby disproving the common misconception that only fringe members of society believe in UFOs. She argues that widespread belief in aliens is due to a number of factors including their ubiquity in modern media like The X-Files, which can influence memory, and the believability lent to that media by the search for planets that might support life. American Cosmic explores the intriguing question of how people interpret unexplainable experiences, and argues that the media is replacing religion as a cultural authority that offers believers answers about non-human intelligent life. From <https://www.amazon.com/American-Cosmic-UFOs-Religion-Technology/dp/019069288X/ref=sr_1_fkmrnull_1_sspa?crid=2J4W4IJSP96EZ&keywords=american+cosmic+ufos%2C+religion%2C+technology&qid=1554998276&s=books&sprefix=american+cosmic%2Cstripbooks%2C165&sr=1-1-fkmrnull-spons&psc=1>

Here’s the silly clincher though, all of us who have had contact have never needed verification of our own selves and our own experiences. Those that have the skills to use the exchange of information go on to do it and brings us great revelations and advancements for mankind, those that don’t have skills, like me, simply get to grow in spirit and heart.

I’d be willing to bet that if you asked every person alive in a 3D body on this earth at this time if they knew, quietly in the back of their mind, in their awareness somewhere that this is all true – without the cultural names and implications – without having to admit it to anybody else, they would all agree – we have all known for a very long time. It’s simply a problem of straightening the language out, the cultural beliefs out, such that one day we can all take a collective breath and sigh in relief that we can just say,

“Yeah, we knew – we knew all along. Cat’s outta the bag now, no problem man, no witch hunts, no roastings, no drownings, no lock ups and most especially no more killings over this issue.”

I wish we could just get out there and get on with it.

 

 

 

 

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

The absolute ABC’s to the whole mess!

This video is a MOST excellent primer for anyone who wants to know – even those of us who’ve been in this for decades. As always Richard Dolan makes sense without asking you to believe the unbelievable. Please watch – with note pad in hand…

The Web of Consciousness: This is the other dot to add to my last article on how ‘Energy Follows Thought’

add this to this:   https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2018/09/25/energy-follows-thought-or-the-l-of-a-or-thoughts-are-causative/

Is the Space Force a way to get the Black Budget back on Budget?

How do CERN, Antarctica and the Space Force all connect? Consider that we DO have directed energy weapons and that with the use of CERN and other agencies, we can affect the sun, and that the ionization of the atmosphere has more than one purpose… Then, connect in the Sun Spot solar observatory hacking (not the porn) and if you are brave enough to stand back far enough to connect the dots, BAM!

This video is just more proof to the pudding. I mean if you need more there is Richard Dolan, or Read Joseph P Farrell, or Peter Levenda etc. It’s all there. Every last little tid bit.

IMO, how Schrodinger’s cat escaped the box. (because he did)

Someday after mastering winds, waves, tides and gravity, we shall harness the energies of love, and then, for the second time in the history of the world, man will discover fire.

— Teilhard de Chardin1

If I could say one thing about this new book I’m reading, “Microcosm and Medium”, by Joseph P. Farrell, it would be that it is a comprehensive lesson on all topics leading to an exploration of consciousness from several viewpoints such as the Mandela effect, ‘Affekt’ itself and how the medium of space itself can be manipulated on a gigantic scale through the manipulation of consciousness. I have blogged before about how large material systems could be used to do this, (Read ‘Giza Death Star’ by Farrell) but now because of the internet and almost telepathic communication – well, instantaneous communication – we can look at the other side of the uncertainty principle – or as it were, bench engineer the observer effect and make it do something to the world. I am always harping on stuff like this.

Here is where the nitty gritty work begins. Because we must be aware of the causes of our trashed world and our mind cages to be able to CHOOSE to say no. And then, we must have an enormous power of love behind it all (cohered intent) to choose not to exact revenge, but to disempower the whole thing by choosing to love the entire world and heal it, instead.

However you are called to do this is the way it should be done. There will be as many ways as there are people, once our subconscious-consensus realizes the power we have to create and heal. And we will. Because we were made that way. We were made to love and cherish all of what and whom we encounter. We were made to stand and emit waves of intelligent infinity, or love to all of creation. We were made to be creators. From <https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2017/02/16/the-opened-heart-plus-the-enlightened-mind/>

Because I am of the opinion that we are being used and this is being done by several groups for several purposes – some of them good and some of the nefarious.

Coherent consciousness creates order in the world. Subtle interactions link us with each other and the Earth. When human consciousness becomes coherent, the behavior of random systems may change. Random number generators (RNGs) based on quantum tunneling produce completely unpredictable sequences of zeroes and ones. But when a great event synchronizes the feelings of millions of people, our network of RNGs becomes subtly structured. We calculate one in a trillion odds that the effect is due to chance. The evidence suggests an emerging noosphere or the unifying field of consciousness described by sages in all cultures. http://noosphere.princeton.edu/

There are times when we share with others a special, fully interconnected consciousness. When great music thrills us, or we are mutually inspired by an awesome sunset, or when we fall in love, we are transported temporarily into a shared world which is remarkable. This state of true intermingling is rare, for most of us, but it is experiential, and that means we know it for what it is; we feel it immediately as real and filled with meaning. When such an experience is past and we return to our normal, separated perceptions, the experience becomes a vulnerable memory, and our educated personality may reject the consciousness that knew this deeper connection. Yet, the suspicion remains that there is something of mind that is not just inside our heads. We feel interconnected with each other and the world in a profound and important way. We know at some level that we are not isolated, but interdependent, so that a subtle energy of mine can reach out and mingle with yours, allowing us to share a moment that is important to both of us. If we think of this potential extending beyond the two of us to a world full of living beings, we have the foundation for a model for global consciousness. Maybe, as Teilhard de Chardin believed, the world ultimately needs that shared consciousness and is actively growing toward it.

The research described here points to subtle indications that we do live in an interconnected, potentially conscious world, in which we surely play an important role. We have shown immense capacities for both destructive and creative impact, and this implies that the future is ours to mold. It will be a desirable future in proportion to our level of consciousness, individually and globally. Fortunately, there are intriguing signs of an emerging integration of purpose and perspective in the world, though it remains fragile and as delicate as a newborn. For this integration to mature, we need great patience, and what we think of as good luck. Perhaps by being more conscious of the possibilities, we can lessen the need for patience and increase our portion of luck. From <http://noosphere.princeton.edu/story.html>

When I talk about things like the direct manipulation of the subconscious-consensus, think Schrodinger’s Cat on steroids, a Cosmic Cat. IF you wanted to test the observer hypothesis on a large scale to see if it would change the physical medium, the constants of our universe like: the speed of light, the plank constant, the cosmological constant, or the gravitational constant, how would you do it? You would have to design an experiment that would affect large numbers of select people in designated clusters with one set of information – the manipulated set, with control groups where no information was manipulated. You would probably have to use mass media or some other way of connecting them to get out specific information. Then you would use services like the NSA server farm, GCHQ, and or the CERN servers to observe and correlate your data.

What would be the types of things you’d be looking for in your data set besides the constants mentioned above? You would look for weird things like:

The Man from Taured (sometimes referred to as the Taured Mystery or the Man without a Country ) is a story about a man who arrives at a Japanese airport from a country called Taured. Many people have claimed this story to be true, so the crux of the problem pertains to Taured. One would notice that there is no country by the name of Taured, either today or during the purported period of time when the incident took place, i.e. the 1950s. The story ends with the man disappearing (forever) a day after arriving in Japan. Moreover, all of his personal documents, such as his passport and driver’s license also (conveniently) disappeared, thus making this strange story unsolvable. From <https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/mysterious-tale-man-taured-evidence-parallel-universes-or-embellishment-005788>

Lerina Garcia woke up one morning and noticed minor differences. Her sheets were unfamiliar, and the pajamas she was wearing were different from the ones she’d gone to sleep in. Her day got weirder when she went to work and discovered that her office was no longer hers, and she worked in the same building, but in a different department, under a boss she’d never met. Bamboozled, she returned home, only to find that her ex-boyfriend was there — only he wasn’t her ex, he was her current boyfriend. Her new lover, whom she’d been dating for months, was nowhere to be found. Lerina believes she woke here, but she’s from a parallel universe where the differences are as small as her bedspread, and as significant as her love life. From <https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/9-eerie-stories-of-people-who-mayve-experienced-a-parallel-d?utm_term=.ocWmYX8Qw>

I specifically remember the news report of Mandela dying in prison in the 1980’s. I remember where I was while hearing those reports on TV and what time of day it was, the age of my children and feeling the world had seriously taken a turn for the worse.

Believe it or not, I started to talk to my weird friends in the 80’s about feeling like I had moved sideways to another, very similar parallel universe because of the ‘feel’ of things’ like an overall tonal effect had distinctly changed.

You would also look for previously uncorrelated things like solar effects and the earth-facing-quiet that Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observes is known for. Or the well-known in some circles solar effect on the stock market. Etc.

Looked at from a cosmological standpoint, you would also begin to speculate that your universe may have become ‘porous’ and where your universe abuts up against another one there may be doorways (portals) and or rips in our fabric of space time – like little hernias. And maybe at some point the nuclear detonations in the 20th century helped that process along just a bit. This basically boils down to an attempt to manipulate the fabric of space time through consciousness.

If this sounds crazy, then I suggest you look onto William A. Tiller’s research, Thomas Bearden, the soviet research, Stanford University, Duke University, Princeton University, Russel Targ, Hall Puthoff, Dean Radin and others.

What could you accomplish with controlling the group (macro) observer effect of which the Mandela effect is an experimental tool? Well, if the observer effect is real and it is obvious somebody thinks it’s really real, then these Mandela effect experiments are an effort to learn about it and to control it – imagine the power that would create for somebody? Also if they wanted people to never find out about this you would create CHAOS – confusion, expectancy, anger and hate, to make people hopeless and helpless – like a mass MKULTA operation in the population. We are all quite aware of that part of it, aren’t we?

Then we have the science end of this approach. In 1935 Gabriel Kron proved that certain transient effects in large rotating electrical fields could be explained by higher dimensional math. He stated that every electrical field is a hybrid dimensional machine because it requires math in more than 3 dimensions to explain it. In the 19th century alone this small partial list of scientists and their work should illustrate that we are actually already engineering the physical medium and using it. We ourselves, are operating electromagnetic fields.


Einstein’s 1928 Special Relativity Paper: incorporation of the torsion tensor made the theory bench engineerable – whether the math eloquently ‘finished’ the theory or not, the equation made laboratory invention of devices to change the local energy of gravity

The Kaluza -Klein Theory that unifies gravity and electromagnetism by the introduction of a new spatial dimension: time, thus uniting Einstein’s theory of gravity with Maxwell’s theory of light by introducing the fifth dimension; four dimensions of space and one dimension of time. Kaluza assumed that light is a disturbance caused by the rippling of this higher dimension.

Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev and zero point energy, dynamic torsion and its effects on the physical medium like time alteration/gravity.

Gabriel Kron’s: tensor equations for electrical machines

E.T. Whittaker: electromagnetic vortices in the space/time medium

Tesla’s: ideas on standing waves (longitudinal waves ) in the medium and that the fabric of space time acts like a fluid to solid bodies and a solid to light and heat

Lt. Col. Tom Bearden: engineering the fabric of the space time continuum is the ability to suddenly put energy into a target area and the ability to suddenly extract energy from a target area

Thomas Townsend Brown: research into odd electrical effects led him to believe he had discovered a connection between strong electric fields and gravity, a type of antigravity effect


When you add this all up it equates to: We can now do anything we like to the physical medium – space, energy, the planet, the sun, life and life force, and us – all of us – body/ /mind/emotions/spirit. So when you hear things like a ‘sun-burp’ or ascension flash – beware, be wary, be very aware: the technology exists to actually create a sun burp. It is not a thing that will happen ‘just because’. It will be created. The reason the idea exists in all surviving ancient myth folklore and ancient texts is because it has been done before. (think ancient psy-op). From <https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2017/11/20/out-on-a-limb-no-a-twig-practically-thin-air-here/>

What I’m getting at is that somebody very badly wants to be King of the Universe and has come at the problem of manipulating space time from every conceivable angle for a very long time. Add CERN into the equation and you have a gross manipulation of the planetary electromagnetic field which affects us and thereby spacetime and also effects the sun and the larger solar system.

The last step in all this is Tiller’s studies on coherent Intension in a group working with a formally specified intension, much like old prayers, old written mantras, ritual things, where everybody says the same words with the same meaning behind them. Formally. Specified. Intension. In a positive manner, almost as a defense. (to de-fence us…)

Now whether this is right or not at this juncture of our development is a moot point, because it already exists. Being one that really does know that there are benevolent forces out there keeping an eye on this extreme game being played called earth, I am pretty sure that no grand carnage will be allowed to occur. However, just like the ancient failed machinery of the megalithic world, the ruins of which we live and breathe in, and the attempt to be sneaky about its machinery back then, we: the muggles are being used in a last ditch attempt to alter the physical medium by using the force of our minds and hearts to get us all humming in one direction and thusly creating the exact effect the somebodies who would be King want. Sneakier still, instead of using the planet they are using the life force of the planet – us.

Get Joseph Farrell’s new book on Lulu and while you are waiting, listen to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs9f8Fpz8wU&t=53s

Gordon White and Richard Dolan

“Ufology ends up in philosophy” – Gordon White

https://youtu.be/WC3s7YOe1Rs

 

Two of my favorite theorists and philosophers in the same place talking about Gordon’s new book Star Ships. It is a very multifaceted rich read, and requires an open mind that can be drawn into a new way of seeing this paradox, allowing layering of the ideas presented in it to arrive at a whole new, and might I say, very valid, view point on not only man kind’s ancient history and story, but a new context for the whole ball of wax.

(I now need to become members on both their sites, along with Joseph Farrell’s site and one other, and I guess it doesn’t matter that I eat, and who needs clothing, anyway. Really.)

I found Rune Soup last year when I realized that I needed a better perspective on the consciousness aspect of how we work. Gordon is not only a true magician, meaning he is searching for the real operating principles of consciousness, he is also a hermeticist, anthropologist, philosopher and true out of the box thinker.

This was his first interview with Richard Dolan. Gordon has a weekly podcast that I listen to with almost religious fervor. Richard and Gordon met at a seminar in Australia given by Catherine Austin Fitts and was present at Richards Wedding Ceremony – which, IMO, doubly blessed the union.

https://youtu.be/TAk-hl6SNaw

Be prepared to have your jaw on the floor – enjoy!