The Paranoid UFO

Science vs. Ufology   

Nuts and bolts vs. Phenomena   

Experiencers vs. Researchers   

Crazy vs. Sane   

TTSA vs. History   

Military vs. Political

Them vs. Us

Controllers vs. a Sane Healthy World

The list is onerous and vast and goes on forever. It’s the way we freaking humans operate! Power. Power over. Nothing shared or open or transparent. Not ever. Bless Jaques Valley for recording a history we would never know for all to read. Bless him and a number of other researchers looking into the phenomena that surrounds everything in this field.

What if the secrecy was about our natural mental/spiritual abilities and had nothing to do with UFO’s but they were used as a smoke screen to muddy the waters so that we never got to the phenomenal part of the equation??

IMO the phenomenal part of the equation is like the nerves to the ears. You may have visible ears but if the nerves that hook them up to the brain aren’t there or don’t work, then you will never ‘hear’ anything. If they cannot control what is happening in the skies, they most certainly can control our minds and they don’t need anything special like a ray gun to do it – they just need to be excellent liars…

This relationship of those who hold the information to those of us who don’t is textbook symptomology of an abusive relationship. You need only look at the literature on line about domestic abuse and it’s all there. The lying, the belittling, conning, the tension building, the explosion and the honeymoon phase. Being that this is a cycle in the larger community it takes longer to manifest – like about every 20 years the ‘next-new-thing’ appears, gets us all riled up and turns out to be a giant psy-op and even if it’s not, it is used against the community like a master manipulator in a relationship who had you believing you love broccoli, when you don’t. Its classic, its textbook. Keeping your head above water in a game like this is treacherous.

This is not to say that the recent information might not be correct…. IMO it probably is, but because of the abuse/manipulation game going on, it is now harder than ever to really know, besides, broccoli isn’t that bad… right?

It’s interesting that all the hoopla is NOT about ‘WOW! Aliens are real and they are here!’ Nope… it’s about who leaked what to whom and when because some want to say halleluiah it’s real and others want desperately to prove its all bunk.

The story that I and others waited for would occur on the last day before Reagan left office. The rumor was that Reagan would appear on TV with a live alien held in a secure compound near the Washington Mall. In the end, Reagan did not appear with the alien and UFO research went on unperturbed by the failure of the prediction. That is how ufology works. It moves from one disclosure rumor to the next. Slowly, through leaks and rumors, knowledge of the ET presence grows. Meanwhile, the classified aspects of the UFO story remain safe.

Cameron, Grant. Managing Magic: The Government’s UFO Disclosure Plan (p. 8). Itsallconnected Publishing. Kindle Edition.

What the government didn’t anticipate was that George Knapp, a respected Emmy Award-winning investigative reporter, would invite Lazar as a guest on his show in March 1989. Indeed, Knapp had an open spot and asked Lear if his buddy, who used to work at the base, could come on.  That back-lit interview Knapp did with Lazar went viral. The next thing the government knew, tour buses were going up into the mountains. The people on the tours were now looking down over the most secret base in the world, hoping to see the government testing a UFO.  Now everything done at the base became the interest of the public, thanks to Knapp’s interview with Lazar. Bill Clinton was forced to issue a Presidential Determination which kept the curious citizens back and tried to prevent them from seeing anything close up. Eventually, the story died down. The UFO community became convinced there were UFOs at the base. The media had a good unproven story, and the government continued with their secret work unaffected.

Cameron, Grant. Managing Magic: The Government’s UFO Disclosure Plan (p. 10). Itsallconnected Publishing. Kindle Edition.

And….basically this is where I sit with the newest ‘revelation’ I’m waiting to see. I suppose you could call me jaded. Been there, done that have about 10 T-shirts…. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, I need to see a therapist. There are a million different ways and variations on whether its real or not, or planted even at the highest levels to fool them so they fool us… who knows? You want real contact, you might as well start trying the CE5 method, go direct to the source. But, be careful because everybody (who is everybody, anyway?!?) knows that there are demons in the aether and you could get one of them instead of a real ET… or you might get abducted and lord knows what! Manipulation. Insidious, and slippery. It has been postulated that the first contact is always a mirror of your fears and expectations. A reflection of your base beliefs. Those beliefs coming out of a basically catholic/Christian belief system – a system that was set up to create the mind cage we all live in, a system set up to implant metaphysical fears to act like a control gate. I agree. The problem is learning to see it for what it is and getting around it. Those fears have been told over and over until they have been embedded in our DNA.

Sometimes I wonder if this is not just some giant graduation test, or if this is the dream and the real is somewhere else, or if I just gather enough information it will be clearer. Can you see the effects of being lied to, manipulated and generally messed with – the pathology – in those words? I can.

Paranoia.

And all I wanted was to be normal, and know the mystery….

 

 

 

Advertisements

The Admiral Wilson Papers

https://imgur.com/a/ggIFTfQ

https://richarddolanmembers.com/articles/article-ufo-leak-of-the-century-richard-dolan-analyzes-the-admiral-wilson-leak/?mc_cid=9f468f6476&mc_eid=cd01059d95

https://youtu.be/Dk7wWp7iL60


IMO: in my opinion…

This document, that Grant Cameron, Michael W. Hall, Richard Dolan and Jimmy Church have brought to light, if provenance can be proved, if actual government documents can be found that support it, is the single most important document of the 21st century for several reasons.

The first, obvious to us in this genre, being all of those years of hearing this information on the down low as back story, with little to no veracity of its paper history, with the hundreds of tendrils of other stories crisscrossing into this larger one, could be, after all basically true. Wow.

It puts people like Sgt. Clifford Stone, Command Sgt. Major Robert Dean, Dr. Steven Greer, Jim Mars, Stanton Friedman, dare I mention Kerry Cassidy, (the list is endless) – quite literally people from our recent past that have been written off as maybe slightly whacky – people who could have been forgotten in the current harassing maze of he-said-she-said horse pucky going on right now (that doesn’t even really deserve mention in light of the real true stuff) back into the equation, where they belong after careers dedicated to bringing the facts out to the public! (Don’t forget Dr. Greer has talked about this meeting for the last 20 or so years in all his talks.) We, or should I say they, have been vindicated. It feels weird. And those of us who have been through many cycles of lies and trickery, are still questioning whether it’s a psy-op. But that’s ok, in fact, it’s needed. DON’T believe anybody. Do your own research and questioning, go dig up reliable facts, then share them.

I am sure, really, they never counted on us to be as tenacious as a starving dog smelling a buried bone. We don’t just ‘Huh, maybe?’ when we see a thing of wonder like last night. No. We don’t just read paragraph by paragraph, No.

We analyze each word in the context of the last 80 years in relation to every tid bit and fact and supposition through the lens of every researcher we’ve ever read and listened to for any innuendo, missed fact, allusion that we can find and take it a part letter by letter in search for any convoluted, hidden, veiled piece of information we can find, because that’s what we have been trained to do over the last 80 years!!!!

Sigh. We will find the provenance, the connections and the threads of the story through all this and someone will write a book on the true story of it all because that’s how we roll.

Second. I am as alarmed at the rewriting, editing and spin being put on the current recrafting of the story being fed to John Q Public about UFO’s as Richard Dolan. The rebranding, the adjusting of the importance scale on various people and facts, the ignoring of provenance, the warped rewriting of history going on by the latest self-proclaimed ‘Authorities’ of the entire field, this new TTSA-Space Force- MIC money for weapons cadre, is trying to sneakily re-write history to their own advantage. Perception management. Ok, its nothing new. Everything is perception management these days. (people who want to control other people have been using terror for centuries and what is implied in the word ‘threat’ is, well, terrifying)

Big sigh, the Admiral Wilson Papers will put a big monkey wrench (funny spell check corrected monkey to money… lol that’s true too) in all that, but to do it in any meaningful way, TTSA will probably IMO, have to acknowledge this document – like spot light it on their much vaunted program and since they have gone over the same incident twice already in two, 45 minute primetime shows, my hope for any progress to something like this document feels like maybe in the next hundred years they just might get around to it… and that’s because it will supremely screw up their narrative, their spin, their purpose for letting out the information they already have. If this document is to be believed they have way more than it looks like they ever wanted to talk to us about.

However as one fellow on twitter last night stated, and I think it was the tweet of the night:

BEST TWEET OF THE NIGHT!!!

The Art of Erik Stitt @Erik_Stitt_Art

Very interesting… The docs are def legit. I’m going to enjoy sitting back and watching the shockwave repercussions of this leak. This is a “no turning back” moment. #f2b @JChurchRadio

From <https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/>

(emphasis mine.)

Because we, who have been at this for countless years and millions of reasons, will take this and run with it and we will get to the bottom of it, proving its reality whatever that may be, truth or psy-op.

We. Will. Find. Out.

Because that’s what we do.

Billy Carson just fires my brain!!

RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsaKSnWotIY

Ep. 1023 FADE to BLACK w/ Billy Carson P3 : Time is an Illusion : LIV

The Emerald tablets were Left Behind as a guideline for the teachers of the world to teach the people – they were never meant to be hidden or secret.

-me

Never..

(Billy Carson just fires my brain!!)

We are allowed to know. In fact, we are encouraged, nay required to know what is our birthright. Those tablets were meant to teach us and help us progress. As it is right now, we are like Romulus and Remus – children set at cast into the forest, wild wolves, with no real history and no real basis for the truth.

 

Time and Timelines: like Birkland Currents in the universe and in our brains

 

Could it be that time lines interweave with each other braid and come apart and braid with other timelines and come apart and each time that happens people of a certain frequency who have changed their frequency and learned jump over to time lines that are touching that are more similar to their own frequency?

 

Can this mean that we are constantly jumping timelines as our own frequency changes?

 

Could it be that it takes a certain number of souls all on the same frequency to actualize a time line for all of humanity, like a quorum?  And by jumping to those timelines where like frequencies exist together, the more people you have on a certain time line the more actualized it becomes ?  The more real?  ( like the hundredth monkey effect – morphic resonance, the tipping point ). Maybe because the more people that join the time line the more real it will become for humanity and what we are seeing are decision points that build enough resonance to actually change the outcome of humanity?  That when enough of these come together the overall direction of humanity can then change? And the rest of humanity is simply dragged along?   Which leads to the next idea that the Mandela  effect may be what we have Left Behind to become who we are today?

This looks very much like Birkland currents in electric universe theory. And very like Bohm’s resonance theory.

 

As above: So below

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A crack in the ceiling

There is a way, in my own experience, to maintain a small crack in our armored state that is open to other perceptions or dimensions or realities, or states. I know, make some sense here… some people travel to other places in their minds, some people astral travel to other places, some people use technology, some people are used and abused with no control or choice over their experiences. Me, being a proponent of ‘both-and’ plus grounded in the biological modality of doing or achieving these things, feel that it can be done while in the normal waking state, being attentive to your inner perceptions and from a position of control and choice over the type and intensity of the situation. Once decided upon and locked in, even in sleep your choices hold and can not be subverted.

In the metaphorical back of my mind, I leave a tiny crack in the ceiling for a small discrete channel of variable frequency go out and come in, sort of like sleeping with one eye open, (it’s a ‘mom thing’) that can be noticed when there is a change and then focused on. Once focused on, there can be information exchange, conversation and perception. This way, you are on call, can receive calls (so to speak) but never vulnerably open too wide. No storm can come through by throwing a door wide open from vast pressure differences, sort of.

I like this because at this level of control I am comfortable. Just like the door to your house, its normally closed and outside unknown people can’t just come wandering through your house at their own whim. It works, it also makes you a very small target, instead of a very shiny object out there in the multiverse, and unless you are an astral warrior, you want to be on the side of dull and boring.

I have some very firm astral barriers from years of practice due to being scared out of my skin almost literally as a child. Took me forever to understand how to do it too, mainly because as a child, everything has authority over you -and we teach our kids this

I have been listening to a lot of people detailing the hoops they had to jump through to have the contact they have, in whatever form they have it, all the bells and whistles they employ to achieve it, and although maybe it’s just simple to me, (but I have a suspicion we are all like this) or maybe I’m just boring enough that not a lot of personages knock at my door, however, IMO (of course) it’s easier than all that. But we, having thousands of years of conditioning to ignore this part of our selves keep looking for keys, technique, tools, or philosophies to get the door open because we think it’s not already under our own control. Just like our children, out in that bigger realm, everybody else has control over us, but us. And…. It’s not true!

You must notice though, that we have been trained to think it is so. Now why would that be? IMO (yet again) because understanding this part of our selves would be the very fastest way to lose control over the earth population. This is one control program that has been in effect and training us for at least the last several thousand years. Also, unbelievably, there are sort of watchdogs in the otherspace to discourage those that find it, usually because we glow so brightly there until we learn to tone it down a bit that we are easy to spot. Easy fodder for hypospace, instead of hyperspace.

There are rules in my space… and they involve things like where my space starts and ends and how far you may intrude upon it, who you are and what you want and what your intent is. Just as people are obvious in physical form – so they are in otherspace. I don’t like being shut down, nor do I like being an open house, so that’s why there’s a crack in my ceiling – lol so I can hear the phone ring, but not offer it to anybody who happens to wander by.

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

With Egg on my Face

I sit before this electronic piece of equipment that is my doorway to the greater world, with egg on my face….

Meaning : ‘To have/caught with egg on your face‘ means to be made to look foolish or to be embarrassed. Origin: “Random House Dictionary of American Slang, Vol. 1, A-G” by J.E. Lighter (Random House, New York, 1994): “have egg on (one’s) face — to look foolish or be embarrassed. https://www.quora.com/What-does-caught-with-egg-on-your-face-mean-and-what-is-its-…

It’s an old idiom, so there’s what it means. Yep, I’m embarrassed for several reasons. One, because I unwittingly let myself get caught in the ongoing hooha I was disparaging in my oh so acerbic opines, and two because the more I felt around inside about this issue, the more I understood it as a lesson in being kind, and collecting all the data I could before I did opine and make an ass of myself. Literally. Lastly, it was a kick in my morally oh so righteous ass that askes ‘Since when did you walk a mile in their shoes?’

So, I’m gonna dust myself off, get up, try again with maybe a little more empathy in my heart aaaand, opine again. This kind of character bashing used to be called slander and defamation of character and back before the internet when we used to have to print stuff like this on paper to make a point, could get you thrown in jail for it. It is one thing to report a verified fact, and another just to give your opinions.

I am guilty of having a bad attitude, justifiable or not to pin it on anyone else as their fault is really immature. I’m 65 – I should know better. Really. I am guilty of listening to others without doing the research – which in this case would have saved my sorry ass from looking like a sorry ass – and forming an opinion on yet another opinion. Just shoot me now. (I suppose this stems from being angry at others for doing it and thusly having the karmic pleasure of doing it myself so I could understand why… ahem)

Here’s the thing. We all complain about what a mess this field is from the half-truths linked to the truth, from the outright dis-information to the lies being almost indistinguishable from the truth.

true /tro͞o/

in accordance with fact or reality.

rightly or strictly so called; genuine.

said when conceding a point in argument or discussion.
accurate or exact.

(interestingly this was an old German word for truce )

We all know about the ‘Truth Embargo’, we all know we have been lied to officially.

So really the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.

So you see, how all of us can get testy. Just a bit… the whole game has been crafted so well, and is so insidious, that we are all ( I was going to say a bit, but this qualifies for full frontal) paranoid.

For What It Is Worth

Buffalo Springfield

There’s something happening here

What it is ain’t exactly clear

There’s a man with a gun over there

Telling me I got to beware

I think it’s time we stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

There’s battle lines being drawn

Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong

Young people speaking their minds

Getting so much resistance from behind

It’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

What a field-day for the heat

A thousand people in the street

Singing songs and carrying signs

Mostly say, hooray for our side

It’s s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Paranoia strikes deep

Into your life it will creep

It starts when you’re always afraid

You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, now, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Songwriters: Stephen Stills

For What It Is Worth lyrics © Warner/Chappell Music, Inc

So here we are. In the mist of another revolution, one not so fun as the sixties and way more important. What are we going to do about it? How are we going to handle it? What kind of example will we set for those who will see this as it transforms the world we live in. We need to get better at this. We really do.

I really do.

In+car+nate + Re = again and again, and again…

In

used as a function word to indicate inclusion, location, or position within limits

carn

carō f (genitive carnis); third declension

flesh, meat  pulp of a fruit  body

*karō f proto-italic: piece, portion (cut off)  meat

nate

Etymology

From older gnātus, from Proto-Italic *gnātos, from Proto-Indo-European *ǵn̥htós (“produced, given birth”), from *ǵenh (“to produce, give birth, beget”).

Perfect active participle of nāscor (“I am born”).

nātus m (feminine nāta, neuter nātum); first/second declension:  born, arisen, made

Incarnation –

late Middle English: from ecclesiastical Latin incarnat- ‘made flesh,’ from the verb incarnare, from in- ‘into’ + caro, carn- ‘flesh.’

Incarnation literally means embodied in flesh or taking on flesh. It refers to the conception and birth of a sentient being who is the material manifestation of an entity, god or force whose original nature is immaterial. In its religious context the word is used to mean the descent from Heaven of a god, deity, or divine being in human/animal form on Earth.  From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarnation>

Add ‘Re’ in front of it and it means again…

What if this planet makes really good avatar bodies? What if the purpose of all of the taking of the DNA is to make an avatar body to experience this place for ET races who want a more inclusive experience – a body with perceptive abilities? I mean, if you wanted to know how perceived pain in a body would translate into an ethic or moral, or societal principle/imperative and thus grow empathy/understanding/unity consciousness in a being, wouldn’t you need to have a means to understand the process????

Some of the above pieces of words have proto (before) Roman/Latin etymology tracings to the Greek language about 1,000 years earlier – leaving out the far earlier Egyptian/Sumerian history (which I know hardly anything about but rest assured they talked about reincarnation then too). Etymology meaning as far back as the word can be traced in history. In other words, they’ve been talking about reincarnation, since before time began.

One wonders that if at one time, eons ago, you knew you were just inhabiting a ‘meat-suit’ of sorts, but as the evolving technology to create an avatar got better over the eons that recognition of spirit was lost as the game became deadly serious? The lesson would definitely become a thousand times more real and teachable if you didn’t know or remember who you really were.

Seeing as how there are fractal shards of your oversoul in every density and dimension simultaneously, and yet very little ability of the one pointed concentration of the shard here on this world is able to access the rest of its being with any ease, might it be the case that this focus in the 3D is exactly what is required to learn empathy through pain?

Density as a scale goes up and down. Dimensions go side to side. This creates a lattice that creates our picture of the universe. (I just had to put a bit of metaphysics in this…)

“When you consider that human beings are the divider between matter and spirit – that we hold both and touch both through consciousness: it makes humanity a portal – doorway through which information is shared to either side of the equation or through the portal. Therefore, just about anything can be looked on as a portal – for in a way, a portal is that ‘idea’ of a crossing point from one state into another.”

Reality runs 10 to the 23rd power times per second. This would be like a very high RF energy wave running into the potential points in the quantum hologram and producing a ‘snap shot’ or collapsing the wave into a particle which IS our reality/snapshot and it all happens so fast that we don’t notice when we are a non-materialized wave.

These quantum points of potential that make up the hologram are information. The wave form is consciousness…

Reality is therefore a condition of energy/consciousness bumping into, or connecting with the hologram (which is a wave guide)   and time is in reality just a blip every 10 to the 23rd time per second that they are touching. It is the movement through the hologram of the energy wave that creates space and time as it connects to the potentials of the hologram. This is how we ‘create’ our reality (and sort of why we are ‘stuck’ in the concept of linear time).

Were you to stop time – freeze the motion of the universe, you would see the lattice structure (very similar to the structure of a crystal) of the physical medium – the zero point field, essentially it’s wave guide. Everything that has matter exists as a part of, or in this field. The very fact that we are consciousness, intelligent awareness is what is attracting and cohering the matter that makes the physical bodies that we inhabit. This is the same for any manifested shape in the physical realm, which presupposes intelligent awareness of one kind or another of everything we can see and touch and some that we can’t.  https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/on-dna-glinda-balls-and-reality-antennas/

Our ability to ‘notice’ new frequencies (at least to us in this now) both from overcoming programming and fear and sharing this information with each other through the internet has begun to open up our acceptance of these perceptions and it is beginning to snow ball into a worldwide phenomenon. We are all starting to accept that we have all had these experiences in one way or another. By sharing this information we are finding a greater ability that seems to open up like lights going on in a dim room because the sharing itself is an algorithmic function growing our knowing exponentially. We are really all of one mind and the more we become aware of that, the faster the information is shared, the faster we all wake up. This, IMO, is why there is such an effort to divide us on so many fronts in so many ways. This is why this information and the regularization (everybody knows it like they know they breath sort of thing) of it to its innateness has been demonized throughout history. I mean, if we all knew this on an innate (inborn) level, well, gracious me! there would be no exterior control of us, and none of the idiocy going on right now would be possible… IMO, of course.

The one theme I’m seeing over and over, not just in what is being reported but out in the regular world, is that things I used to have to spend hours explaining to my friends, just to talk about it with them, are now widely accepted and digested – we have reached a very important tipping point and it just whizzed by right under our noses.

A friend of mine keeps seeing himself and his life from other dimensions, like they are overlapping somehow. He said the other him is aware of this him and has even smiled at him and this is happening in a waking state. At work, almost clearly defined people are walking through his office through the walls going places – like his office space is superimposed over a mall in another dimension.

My kitchen is definitely lower than it is other dimensionally because I have been talking with people on skype who always see legs from the knees down walking by my kitchen window outside. This has happened with more than one person and more than once. I have been traversing sideways (dimensionally) since the 80’s. I will wake up and notice very subtle shifts in my life and it will feel slightly different and there is always that ‘oops’ feeling about it. I’ve learned not to worry because there is never any really great change, a lot of my dimensional lives must be extremely similar… I’m opinionated everywhere…LMAO, at least in the string of frequencies I’ve been visiting lately.

The point of all of this is that even though we all feel stuck in a very messy, mucky time right now where it seems like the world is gonna pop, it’s not. We are just expanding who and what we are to the horror of the elite (who have helped us greatly achieve this by being buttheads) and the great joy of many ‘others’ out there who have been waiting for us to shake off the eons of misapprehension about what life really is and come out and play with the big kids in the universe. We are fast approaching this juncture – even those of us who are considered the peanut gallery who supposedly know nothing.

We are beautiful souls walking around in a flesh and blood avatar. We, especially those of us who have for gotten that we are beautiful beings of light inside, have been privileged enough to learn very intimately what it means to possess true empathy and unity with the other both because of the body and in spite of the body. We know we are about at the end of this long arduous journey because our empathy is such that we now only need learn of, hear, or see another’s pain – interspecies or otherwise across all boundaries and we have the capacity to ‘feel for’ the other. It may have taken a few thousand incarnations and years, but, here we are. Our perceptive abilities have opened enough to include more than one density and multiple dimensions while awake and in the 3D mind. I suspect the speed of this transformation is almost totally dependent on how much we share it, that the more regular this can become, the better we will all be at it.

One day this earth will be a beautiful place to hang out.

 

Spin

I play this game when I want to understand how language hooks ideas together and to ferret out odd meanings of things. I call it Dictionary Chase. I start with a word look it up and find the next most interesting word in the definition of the first one and so on.

spin

verb

give (a news story or other information) a particular interpretation, especially a favorable one.

draw out (wool, cotton, or other material) and convert it into threads, either by hand or with machinery.

spin wool into the yarn for weaving

make (threads) by drawing out and twisting fibers.

a particular bias, interpretation, or point of view, intended to create a favorable (or sometimes, unfavorable) impression when presented to the public.

synonyms:

slant, angle, twist, bias

Origin

Old English spinnan ‘draw out and twist (fiber)’; related to German spinnen . The noun dates from the mid 19th century.

A yarn is a story and when you tell it you are weaving the story…

yarn

noun

noun: yarn; plural noun: yarns

spun thread used for knitting, weaving, or sewing.

informal
a long or rambling story, especially one that is implausible.

synonyms:

story, tale, anecdote, saga, narrative, tall tale, tall story, fish story, cock-and-bull story, shaggy-dog story, spiel

verb

informal

verb: yarn; 3rd person present: yarns; past tense: yarned; past participle: yarned; gerund or present participle: yarning

tell a long or implausible story.
“they were yarning about local legends and superstitions

Some stories can be very hard to believe…

implausible

im·plau·si·ble

imˈplôzəb(ə)l/

adjective

adjective: implausible

(of an argument or statement) not seeming reasonable or probable; failing to convince.
“this is a blatantly implausible claim”

synonyms:

unlikely, improbable, questionable, doubtful, debatable unrealistic, unconvincing, far-fetched, incredible, unbelievable, unimaginable, inconceivable, fantastic, fanciful, ridiculous, absurd, preposterous, impossible, hard to swallow, cock and bull

 

Which you, to make it a good and a plausible story, draw out your points (threads) and twist them to fit your ideas: you spin your threads…

spin

spin/

verb

give (a news story or other information) a particular interpretation, especially a favorable one.

draw out (wool, cotton, or other material) and convert it into threads, either by hand or with machinery.
“they spin wool into the yarn for weaving”

make (threads) by drawing out and twisting fibers.
“this method is used to spin filaments from syrups”

a particular bias, interpretation, or point of view, intended to create a favorable (or sometimes, unfavorable) impression when presented to the public.

synonyms:

slant, angle, twist, bias

Creating a bias – a slant, your slant – almost like a little white lie like you tell your parents to escape punishment…

bias

noun

noun: bias; plural noun: biases

prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.
“there was evidence of bias against foreign applicants”

a concentration on or interest in one particular area or subject.

synonyms:

prejudice, partiality, partisanship, favoritism, unfairness, one-sidedness; bigotry, intolerance, discrimination, leaning, tendency, inclination, predilection, caste-ism,

influence, color, sway, weight, predispose, distort, skew, slant

 

Statistics:

systematic distortion of a statistical result due to a factor not allowed for in its derivation.

Usually to make your point, create your point of view and to control the story and the people listening to it by creating a prejudice…

prejudice

plural noun: prejudices

preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.

synonyms:

preconceived idea, preconception, prejudgment, dislike, hostility, or unjust behavior deriving from unfounded opinions.

Which invariably creates actions towards the other viewpoints that are combative…

verb: prejudice

verb: prejudice; 3rd person present: prejudices; past tense: prejudiced; past participle: prejudiced; gerund or present participle: prejudicing

Law
cause harm to (a state of affairs).

synonyms:

damage, be detrimental to, be prejudicial to, injure, harm, hurt, spoil, impair, undermine, hinder, compromise


The point being to lock your head into ONLY one way of seeing, observing, understanding a topic for one reason and one reason only, CONTROL – of you.

This is the season of SPIN. It’s coming at you from every direction, 360 degrees, possible. Spin does not mean the information is incorrect, or wrong, it just means a little off from true, its slanted, partisan – toward one party or faction or another. The fact that it is being used to create a prejudice within us, however, to foment emotion and cement or change our loyalties needs to be noted. I am reminded of John Rappoport’ s article: The night the world recovered its sanity.   We are all totally free to choose one perspective over another – one bias over another, just as long as we have thought it through and don’t allow it to close off our minds to what might be found in the future to be a more complete understanding of the whole.

Keep the damned trap door open…..

Crumbs

Today is one of those days where I sit and I can feel the tug of the light and the dark or the happy and the sad, or the neg. and the pos. and it is with effort that I stay on the razor’s edge. Balance. Because tumbling off in one direction or another at this point would not be a vote for either, but a falling into a messy whirlpool and getting sucked under into a place of no choice and no wisdom and no understanding. Something inside of me knows that giving in to the lure and pull of either right now would increase the swirling confusion surrounding us all.

There is a niggling sense in the back of my consciousness that is telling me that the confusion has a purpose for control at a very deep integral level, that jumping off either side would send us all back to sleep again, but, like awakening in the morning, what is needed is a stretch and a few good deep breaths. Plus a little loosening up, a bit of morning clarity, a damned good cup of coffee, and some strategizing about how to keep your head above the maelstrom. It has become the ubiquitous job of the century, this waiting for the ornery children to be done with their games so the real business of setting things to rights can begin.

Those of us who wait and watch are getting feisty, ready to jump on anything hoping for that one tiny morsel of whatever that will open the flood gates to intelligent information. While others out there are already scheming on how to make the next dollar by taking any scrap of stupidity and creating the next great calamity to make a buck off of. With all of the normal, really intelligent, cogent sources of information out there almost totally gagged by the thought police, finding any information that is not pathetically warped is difficult. Point in case, I found a video that Walter Bosley (Thank You Walter!)uploaded yesterday that really addressed the Sun Spot issue with more than just one brain cell. He does have inside sources, he did call them and he did report with his intelligence background hat on what I assumed was going on all along. I alluded to it in ‘Quicksilver’ but the imp in me had to add the rest of it… (not sorry) – lol.

One of the points that nobody wanted to be responsible on were all the other ‘supposed’ observatory closings, which after listening to LMH’s regular Wednesday live broadcast, I knew were false – and some idiots out there are still trying to say the observatories themselves were closed. (does no one know how to check on these things????) What went down were the satellite link ups which included the live cams to public output for as long as it took to trace the ‘leak’ and plug it up because the observatories were all linked via satellite. Many possibilities here…

I am rather frustrated (other words would be more succinct and to the point, however…) those that do have the ability and resources, inside information etc. to report on instances like this are either blocked or are now under a pay to view veil. I can’t say that I blame them, but it makes the bread crumbs coming out to the public dwindle to almost nothing – AND it helps the faction trying to infiltrate the altmedia and make it look ridiculous accomplish their goals without even trying. When I added up the pay to read-view sights that I think have great merit and would love to follow, it came up to well over $500 dollars a year. I can’t even afford one of them, and I only looked into 4 sites. So there you go, one way or another cogent information is getting buried under the need (and truly I do understand the need to eat) to survive.

And…. So it goes. Balance. The middle path. The larger picture. The bread crumbs through the forest. Trudging on. As those breadcrumbs begin to dwindle on an ever darkening path.

 

Journey bravely.