The Paranoid UFO

Science vs. Ufology   

Nuts and bolts vs. Phenomena   

Experiencers vs. Researchers   

Crazy vs. Sane   

TTSA vs. History   

Military vs. Political

Them vs. Us

Controllers vs. a Sane Healthy World

The list is onerous and vast and goes on forever. It’s the way we freaking humans operate! Power. Power over. Nothing shared or open or transparent. Not ever. Bless Jaques Valley for recording a history we would never know for all to read. Bless him and a number of other researchers looking into the phenomena that surrounds everything in this field.

What if the secrecy was about our natural mental/spiritual abilities and had nothing to do with UFO’s but they were used as a smoke screen to muddy the waters so that we never got to the phenomenal part of the equation??

IMO the phenomenal part of the equation is like the nerves to the ears. You may have visible ears but if the nerves that hook them up to the brain aren’t there or don’t work, then you will never ‘hear’ anything. If they cannot control what is happening in the skies, they most certainly can control our minds and they don’t need anything special like a ray gun to do it – they just need to be excellent liars…

This relationship of those who hold the information to those of us who don’t is textbook symptomology of an abusive relationship. You need only look at the literature on line about domestic abuse and it’s all there. The lying, the belittling, conning, the tension building, the explosion and the honeymoon phase. Being that this is a cycle in the larger community it takes longer to manifest – like about every 20 years the ‘next-new-thing’ appears, gets us all riled up and turns out to be a giant psy-op and even if it’s not, it is used against the community like a master manipulator in a relationship who had you believing you love broccoli, when you don’t. Its classic, its textbook. Keeping your head above water in a game like this is treacherous.

This is not to say that the recent information might not be correct…. IMO it probably is, but because of the abuse/manipulation game going on, it is now harder than ever to really know, besides, broccoli isn’t that bad… right?

It’s interesting that all the hoopla is NOT about ‘WOW! Aliens are real and they are here!’ Nope… it’s about who leaked what to whom and when because some want to say halleluiah it’s real and others want desperately to prove its all bunk.

The story that I and others waited for would occur on the last day before Reagan left office. The rumor was that Reagan would appear on TV with a live alien held in a secure compound near the Washington Mall. In the end, Reagan did not appear with the alien and UFO research went on unperturbed by the failure of the prediction. That is how ufology works. It moves from one disclosure rumor to the next. Slowly, through leaks and rumors, knowledge of the ET presence grows. Meanwhile, the classified aspects of the UFO story remain safe.

Cameron, Grant. Managing Magic: The Government’s UFO Disclosure Plan (p. 8). Itsallconnected Publishing. Kindle Edition.

What the government didn’t anticipate was that George Knapp, a respected Emmy Award-winning investigative reporter, would invite Lazar as a guest on his show in March 1989. Indeed, Knapp had an open spot and asked Lear if his buddy, who used to work at the base, could come on.  That back-lit interview Knapp did with Lazar went viral. The next thing the government knew, tour buses were going up into the mountains. The people on the tours were now looking down over the most secret base in the world, hoping to see the government testing a UFO.  Now everything done at the base became the interest of the public, thanks to Knapp’s interview with Lazar. Bill Clinton was forced to issue a Presidential Determination which kept the curious citizens back and tried to prevent them from seeing anything close up. Eventually, the story died down. The UFO community became convinced there were UFOs at the base. The media had a good unproven story, and the government continued with their secret work unaffected.

Cameron, Grant. Managing Magic: The Government’s UFO Disclosure Plan (p. 10). Itsallconnected Publishing. Kindle Edition.

And….basically this is where I sit with the newest ‘revelation’ I’m waiting to see. I suppose you could call me jaded. Been there, done that have about 10 T-shirts…. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, I need to see a therapist. There are a million different ways and variations on whether its real or not, or planted even at the highest levels to fool them so they fool us… who knows? You want real contact, you might as well start trying the CE5 method, go direct to the source. But, be careful because everybody (who is everybody, anyway?!?) knows that there are demons in the aether and you could get one of them instead of a real ET… or you might get abducted and lord knows what! Manipulation. Insidious, and slippery. It has been postulated that the first contact is always a mirror of your fears and expectations. A reflection of your base beliefs. Those beliefs coming out of a basically catholic/Christian belief system – a system that was set up to create the mind cage we all live in, a system set up to implant metaphysical fears to act like a control gate. I agree. The problem is learning to see it for what it is and getting around it. Those fears have been told over and over until they have been embedded in our DNA.

Sometimes I wonder if this is not just some giant graduation test, or if this is the dream and the real is somewhere else, or if I just gather enough information it will be clearer. Can you see the effects of being lied to, manipulated and generally messed with – the pathology – in those words? I can.

Paranoia.

And all I wanted was to be normal, and know the mystery….

 

 

 

Advertisements

Billy Carson just fires my brain!!

RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsaKSnWotIY

Ep. 1023 FADE to BLACK w/ Billy Carson P3 : Time is an Illusion : LIV

The Emerald tablets were Left Behind as a guideline for the teachers of the world to teach the people – they were never meant to be hidden or secret.

-me

Never..

(Billy Carson just fires my brain!!)

We are allowed to know. In fact, we are encouraged, nay required to know what is our birthright. Those tablets were meant to teach us and help us progress. As it is right now, we are like Romulus and Remus – children set at cast into the forest, wild wolves, with no real history and no real basis for the truth.

 

Time and Timelines: like Birkland Currents in the universe and in our brains

 

Could it be that time lines interweave with each other braid and come apart and braid with other timelines and come apart and each time that happens people of a certain frequency who have changed their frequency and learned jump over to time lines that are touching that are more similar to their own frequency?

 

Can this mean that we are constantly jumping timelines as our own frequency changes?

 

Could it be that it takes a certain number of souls all on the same frequency to actualize a time line for all of humanity, like a quorum?  And by jumping to those timelines where like frequencies exist together, the more people you have on a certain time line the more actualized it becomes ?  The more real?  ( like the hundredth monkey effect – morphic resonance, the tipping point ). Maybe because the more people that join the time line the more real it will become for humanity and what we are seeing are decision points that build enough resonance to actually change the outcome of humanity?  That when enough of these come together the overall direction of humanity can then change? And the rest of humanity is simply dragged along?   Which leads to the next idea that the Mandela  effect may be what we have Left Behind to become who we are today?

This looks very much like Birkland currents in electric universe theory. And very like Bohm’s resonance theory.

 

As above: So below

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The season of the rant: A Piece of the Action

This seems to be the season of the rant, so here is some more of my 2 cents.

IMO we, earthlings are simple, give us bone to chew and it will infiltrate through the substrata of our cultures and appear, as somebody will want it enough to invent it.. Give us a new idea and we, if we like it, will run with it and make it real. Need I point out how many devices were created from the TV show Star Trek that are now real? In some cases this pays off, in others, not so much.

Now, when you are looking at the effects of an extreme disinformation campaign like the one surrounding the topic of UFO’s where (gee let me repeat myself for the third time)

We all know about the ‘Truth Embargo’, we all know we have been lied to officially.

So really the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.

You wind up with a reaction that causes

ex·trem·ism  /ikˈstrēˌmizəm/

noun

noun: extremism; plural noun: extremisms

the holding of extreme political or religious views; fanaticism.
“the dangers of religious extremism”

Extremism means, literally, “the quality or state of being extreme” or the “advocacy of extreme measures or views”. The term is primarily used in a political or religious sense, to refer to an ideology that is considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of society. It can also be used in an economic context. Wikipedia

 

Although we who are rather embedded in this UFO issue see this as a huge issue, it could be just one of several tactics being used on the planet at this moment to destabilize society of any kind. One of the most insidious programs to break down and restructure the way relationships are conducted from person to person all the way up through the global arena has been:

Postmodernism: a broad movement that developed in the mid- to late-20th century across philosophy, the arts, architecture, and criticism and that marked a departure from modernism.[1][2][3] The term has also more generally been applied to the historical era following modernity and the tendencies of this era.[4] (In this context, “modern” is not used in the sense of “contemporary”, but merely as a name for a specific period in history.)

While encompassing a wide variety of approaches, postmodernism is generally defined by an attitude of skepticism, irony, or rejection toward the meta-narratives and ideologies of modernism, often calling into question various assumptions of Enlightenment rationality.[5] Consequently, common targets of postmodern critique include universalist notions of objective reality, morality, truth, human nature, reason, language, and social progress.[5] Postmodern thinkers frequently call attention to the contingent or socially-conditioned nature of knowledge claims and value systems, situating them as products of particular political, historical, or cultural discourses and hierarchies.[5] Accordingly, postmodern thought is broadly characterized by tendencies to self-referentiality, epistemological and moral relativism, pluralism, subjectivism, and irreverence.[5]

Postmodern critical approaches gained purchase in the 1980s and 1990s, and have been adopted in a variety of academic and theoretical disciplines, including cultural studies, philosophy of science, economics, linguistics, architecture, feminist theory, and literary criticism, as well as art movements in fields such as literature and music. Postmodernism is often associated with schools of thought such as deconstruction and post-structuralism, as well as philosophers such as Jean-François Lyotard, Jacques Derrida, and Fredric Jameson. Some philosophers have criticized the term.   From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism>

(I got this idea from listening to Richard Dolan and Micah Hanks)

And what we are seeing above is the result of: the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years. In other words, the kick back from being lied to – especially if you’re are not sure just when or where that occurred is to call absolutely everything suspect. The second thing is then to question the motives behind absolutely everything. The third thing that happens is … Paranoia. In a word.

Which really, in one way, is a good thing or none of us would have ever found out about things like monsanto (not capitalizing the word, as it doesn’t deserve that honor), or big pharma, or vaccines, or education, the stealing of social security and then taxing it, or, for heaven sake ancient history (its freaking endless)or any of the other myriad ways we have been lied to and manipulated.

This is part of the problem going on in the UFO genre right now between all the little guys, in the chat rooms and the twitterverse, or FB, the mood is murderous. What makes all of us think that when every other strata of society has been targeted that ours wouldn’t be is fairly insane. It has been from the beginning and that is a fact we have to take on board and work with and around to gain any real grip of some assemblance of truth. Like it or lump it. The common narrative is that: Everything has been weaponized against us.

Which is also why they can also use the idea of a savior against us. Just like a cargo cult, we want ET to come and save us. Which IMO most certainly will NOT happen. Mainly because of the real prime directive. Trust me, if we as kids can think of this idea and extrapolate the need for it, it probably is real in one form or another.

Which reminds me of:

“A Piece of the Action”, a second season episode of the American science fiction television series Star Trek, first broadcast on January 12, 1968; its repeat on August 30, 1968, was the last episode to air in the 8:30 pm time slot on Friday nights. It is episode #46, production #49, written by David P. Harmon and Gene L. Coon, and directed by James Komack.

In the comedic episode, the Enterprise visits a planet with an Earth-like 1920s gangster culture, with Runyonesque dialog and costumes. From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Piece_of_the_Action_(Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series)>

Returning to a planet last visited by an Earth ship 100 years earlier, the Enterprise finds a planet that has based its culture on the Chicago gangsters of the 1920s. Since the Horizon‘s visit was before the Federation’s Prime Directive against non-interference, Kirk, Spock and McCoy are concerned about what effects the Horizon‘s crew may have had on the Iotian culture which was just beginning industrialization at the time and had a knack for imitation. The three beam down to find a culture resembling that of Chicago in the 1920s. They are immediately greeted by two men dressed as gangsters who threaten them with Tommy guns. From <http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/A_Piece_of_the_Action_(episode)> And why? All because the Horizon’s crew left a book behind on Chicago in the roaring 20’s.

This is a clear example of a cargo cult.

Cargo cults often develop during a combination of crises. Under conditions of social stress, such a movement may form under the leadership of a charismatic figure. This leader may have a “vision” (or “myth-dream”) of the future, often linked to an ancestral efficacy (“mana“) thought to be recoverable by a return to traditional morality.[1][3] This leader may characterize the present state as a dismantling of the old social order, meaning that social hierarchy and ego boundaries have been broken down.[4] From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult> (italics mine)

From what I can see, that’s pretty much the state of things down here for us ‘ground-pounders’. But now we want ‘A Piece of the Action’ too.

 

 

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

Of Cages

The fights we are seeing going on right now echo two things in my mind, well maybe three.
1. the dark magic is reminiscent of the Jack Parsons/Crowley/Hubbard stuff from the 1940’s repeating and the magical alchemy of money BMMS (lol – Babylonian Money Magic System) (2)

2. the ‘two groups fighting resemble the light and the dark brotherhoods of the mystery schools (who believe it or not folks are being controlled by this larger force such that they are both too busy to see that third force)

3. this all kinda goes back to the survivors of the great cosmic war when they blew up a planet, wound up here and have never stopped creating MESS. (of which number two is only the latest iteration)

The cult mentality of all of it is even more concerning. Information on cults:

Humans desire comfort, and in a fearful and uncertain world many turn to cults because they tend to promote exactly that. Jon-Patrik Pedersen, a psychologist at CalTech, has pointed out that cult leaders often make promises that are totally unattainable, but also offered by no other group in society. Such things might include financial security, total health, constant peace of mind, and eternal life — the things every human desires at the deepest level. (savior mentality)

Cults satisfy the human desire for absolute answers.

Those with low self-esteem are more likely to be persuaded by a cult environment.

New recruits are “love bombed.”

Women are more likely than men to join a cult.

Many cult members have rejected religion.

Cults maintain their power by promoting an “us vs. them” mentality.

Cult leaders are masters at mind control.

Ways in which leaders gain control over cult members vary, but some popular methods include:

Public Humiliation: New cult members may be “love bombed” shortly after their arrival, but once they are established members, cult leaders often maintain emotional control through various exercises meant to publicly humiliate a member. One such method involves someone sitting in a chair surrounded by other members, at which time they are required to admit their recent failures, base thoughts, shortcomings, etc.

Self-Incrimination: A favorite tactic of the infamous cult leader Jim Jones, self-incrimination requires cult members to provide their leader with written statements detailing their individual fears and mistakes. The cult leader can then use these statements to shame individual members publicly.

Brainwashing: Cult leaders are known to repeat various lies and distortions until members find it difficult to distinguish between reality and cult life.

Paranoia: To maintain a false sense of comfort, cults often rely on paranoia tactics. Cult leaders convince their victims that a group, their families, and/or the government is out to get them, but that the cult can provide safety. Once a cult member comes to the conclusion that their families and country cannot keep them safe, they begin to worship and put all of their faith in their cult leader. Jim Jones was especially skilled at this mind-control trick. He would encourage members to spy on each other, and consistently spoke through loudspeakers at all hours of the day so that cult members would hear his voice whether awake or asleep.

Cult members often have no idea they’re in a cult.

Cult life can have a dangerous and lasting effect.

He specifically mentions that the “symptoms of temporal lobe epilepsy are similar to those seen or reported as resulted from cult conversions:

increased irritability

loss of libido or altered sexual interest

ritualism

compulsive attention to detail

mystical states

humorlessness and sobriety

heightened paranoia

From <https://www.onlinepsychologydegree.info/what-to-know-about-the-psychology-of-cults/>

In case you choose to say, ‘Not Me’…

Before jumping into the specifics, I’d like to briefly discuss an insidious psychological process called the “Self-serving Bias.” This bias leads us to believe that we are immune to the influences that affect the rest of humanity. I run into this bias all the time when describing my work on resistance to persuasion: “I think it’s great that you’re trying to help people resist television ads. Of course, TV ads don’t persuade me…”

The self-serving bias has been demonstrated countless times: the majority of Americans believe they are smarter and better looking than average; most drivers (even those hospitalized for accidents) believe themselves more skilled than the average driver; most smog-breathing Los Angelinos believe themselves healthier than their neighbors; most college students believe they will outlive their predicted age of death by 10 years, and so on.

The most ironic example of the self-serving bias that I’ve ever heard appeared in a social psychology paper written by one of Kelton’s students. After the self-serving bias had been discussed in class, this student wrote:

“I don’t understand why they say the self-serving bias is universal. I mean, I see it in other people, but I personally don’t have a self-serving bias.”

I’m not kidding, the student really wrote that!

From <http://www.workingpsychology.com/cultdef.html>
What do you do with information you want to have hidden and keep hidden? You swear those who know to secrecy with ideas like the destruction of mankind because mankind cannot handle the power and importance of this information and you hide it behind mystery schools. (1) This causes the information to land in two select groups. One that will have a moral and ethical bent towards the greatest good, and one that will keep and use the information for their own advancement (breakaways and ppl like those who run CERN and HARRP)
IMO we are looking at a worldwide psy-op (cult) that nobody really knows the full extent of, with even the mystery schools, prominent and excellent researchers, governments and alphabet soups and all the others being played as useful-idiots.

We are all being played.

When the

‘…only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.’

is the only thing we can be sure of, then the world is operating as one giant cult.
And instead of recognizing this most people are acting like captives in a cage scrambling for the biggest scraps that land through the bars, while diligent souls who have real information are drowned out by insignificant and useful idiots such that the mass confusion creates its own control system. Problem solved for the cage tenders.
OMG!!!
(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m2Qvh85QBY&list=PLNfJkzByQRux01gvudalzEGUgoH496qay

(2) https://youtu.be/r3-wlD8LOM4BMMS

Energy Follows Thought, or, the L of A, or thoughts are causative …

So, last night on the Jimmy Church Radio Show, he interviewed Mitch Horowitz. Come to find out that Mitch has interview on Gordon White’s pod cast, Rune Soup. The first thing I did this morning was listen to it! (so where has he been in my cosmology???)

Basically the interview turned out to be a pretty comprehensive history of the development of Spiritualism in America and its roots. The concept of ‘Earthing” spiritual/magical energies in a place for their manifestation in 3D life was mentioned, which made me think of Skin Walker Ranch. It also made me think of an interview by John Burroughs on Phenomenon Radio, KGRA interviewing Winston (Win) Keech and Ronny Dugdale on 06-21-2018   From <https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=3628&action=edit> (this is a REALLY IMPORTANT dot connector and nobody has noticed it!) where Win Keech goes into great detail on how the earthing, or wearing-in of energetic patterns in one place over time attracts telluric currents that stay resonant on the ground. (megalithic sites, churches and in America, governmental buildings and mounds) Basically America is the country that has at its roots the spiritualist principles of Hermeticism – IE: America = a MACRO RITUAL experiment. Hmmm

So when European spiritualism blossomed in America it started in the 1800’s in an area in central New York state called the Burned-over district (burning with the fires of spiritualism) that began to be inhabited after they kicked out the Iroquois Indians from their homeland. It’s an area in a 20-35 mile swath along Rt.22 in New England and it was the birth place in America for such movements as:

Spiritualism

The Fox sisters

The Mormon Joseph Smith

The Suffragettes

The New England Mental Healing Movement

Mesmerism

Trance mediums

You name it, it was going on there. Which says to me that the Iroquois who lived there first were also very spiritual, or those patterns would not have so easily developed there. There are places in the world that are known as window areas where the veil is thin, or the magnetics are different or the peoples were gifted.

There is also a known esoteric principle of attraction (Law of Attraction) which basically means that you will attract to you your core frequency of what you feel and think about on a daily basis – it’s almost the undertone of your personality that you never really pay attention to. The same goes for locations/places on the earth. The CORE energy in the ground memory of the place – what the rock and ground have absorbed (having lots of quartz on the ground helps hold the frequency, like granite or limestone) sets the tone for the TYPES of energies that can exist there. Like attracts like in all band widths. Montauk is also part of New England. It is interesting that there are bare limestone outcroppings that occur in both New England and the Skinwalker ridge. There are also aquifers that underlie both areas, making them natural stone henges by their connection of an electrically conductive rock and flowing water. Linda Moulton Howe has an interview where she talked to a scientist that pointed out a building built on top of one such area just to control the magnetic field in the area due to extreme instability.

My point in all of this?

Once again we are looking at the crossing of science and spirit. In. Our. Faces. Science can measure the physicality of these places, but the human psyche is the instrument that not only detects the anomaly, but sets the tone for the interaction with it. I have looked at just two examples, one negative: Skin Walker Ranch, and one positive: New England. We need only to look at the history of contact in both spots to understand the role that human consciousness and Focused Intent has had on both areas. Both of those areas are also rife with UFO and weird phenomenal reports of all kinds. As all we channelers know, we always attract what we put out – as above, so below. (if you are looking, you will be looked at) I wonder what this says for those places around the world where they are fracking and purposefully sending poison deep into our earth and the ground we live on and in? We are on the verge of really putting together the truth about how we could change our lives and the world – from so MANY different points along the circle called consciousness/physics. I wonder if that is why 5G, the ionization of the atmosphere, and the propaganda are being flung at us so very hard?

“Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.”

Really, what is going on? Are we being very cleverly distracted? I think so. Something is happening that we are not supposed to notice, that maybe if we did we’d all collectively tell it to bug-off. But, because we are not aware of it, really not aware of it, we do not have that choice.

So, what could it be? What are we not noticing?

I am currently reading a new book by Joseph Farrell called “Microcosm and Medium”, only available through Lulu Press. They print one book at a time and mail it to you. It’s a nice sturdy paperback and I am half way through the book. Let us just say that what Joseph calls high speculation – out on a twig, is really quite straight forward and makes absolute sense in the total arc of his books to date, while explaining some of the more fringe ideas shifting them into not so fringe at all range.

What I am going to say next, he will not like, however, it puts Corey Goode’s dialogue about the manipulation of the vast well of human unconsciousness being used for someone else’s purposes into sharp relief and the science of mind manipulation in the modern age into even starker relief against the background of the possible uses for geopolitical – even exopolitical gain. As Joseph goes on to explain (imo) it is not only the mind, but the emotions, the passion of the human being that is used too. Before the current  age of scientism, there was not a(schizophrenic) split between the passions (the emotions) and the mind.

“Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.”

Lord Acton, a British historian of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

He is perhaps best known for the remark, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men…”, which he made in a letter to an Anglican bishop.[4] From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dalberg-Acton,_1st_Baron_Acton>

In this world it has always seemed that those with the most money, had the most freedom, as if to say that freedom tends to loosen the bad moral character of the human being, when there is no punishment and no consequence moral degradation is the result. But is this really true? If you look at history, it seems the norm.

Not until there are great and horrible consequences will the people turn to self-examination to change their moral high ground and shift it higher. But, changing behavior to avoid a punishment is like a kid lying to their parent to escape punishment for their mischief. That’s kind of like negative behavior modification. It is NOT acting on wisdom and empathy nor is it adult at all.

For those of us trying to help the world, it causes 3 times the work because there is constant fixing and back tracking to mend the damage done by unthinking, uncaring people. It means we are all still living in the negative response mode one step forward, two steps backward.

Intentionality, being the directive force of the power of the mind, is a major theme in this book and it pulls the science of quantum mechanics and the observer – the ‘intentioner’ directly into the equation. Not only that he covers the studies that were being done when a group of people use a unified intention to modify reality, or the medium from experiments originating back before WW2 all over the globe to current time. And there we are back at Corey Goode’s message.

So, if you were looking for an overarching game, I would start from trying to figure out what the intent was behind all the seemingly disparate and nasty crap going on right now – searching a pattern, and I would keep enlarging the data pool until a pattern emerged. An analogy would be to see at ground level taking off in a plane and spiraling around the thing I was trying to see higher and higher until could grasp the entire picture. And then I would creatively try to posit logical outcomes from that intent – the idea behind the pattern – like profiling the instigator or perp. However, I would have to do it in light of physics principles like the equal and opposite reactions of a physical body in motion and just how the observer affect can and does change the outcomes of everything we think is real. Then I would have to ask the question WHO is observing and twisting our reality to their ends using our minds to do it by manipulating what we think is real and our emotional responses to that. .

And trust me, not only does this work naturally, with out machines, but the technology exists to create this change in the human mind-pool of the earth too, and they are using it and it is totally related to what is happening to the earth, the weather, the ground, and the life on this planet at this moment . Is it no wonder then, that we cannot grow up, evolve and become a mature race?

It has been said that we live in a free will universe and that no creature can manipulate or limit another’s free will with out consequences. Except that it seems to be the entire issue here. We have no free will, and at that, we willingly hand it over to others to manage all the time. Willingly hand it over. The point.

We bandy about the term ‘frequency’ a lot without understanding the absolute interpenetration of the vibratory rates of all things at the very base of the all that is all. There really is nothing else, and if you know how to manipulate the frequencies of your reality, then you are King.

Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.

P.S. more speculations after I finish this amazing book.

P.P.S.  This book, like all of Joseph’s work, is backed up by 9 pages of citations and extensive resources. So where this article is nothing more than speculation and opining, his book definitely is not.

On herding cats and perception

When you are considering a subject that relies ultimately on perception, whether that be a nuts and bolts scientifically ‘measured’ perception, or an internal perception, we are still talking about perceiving, which will always be different from one perceptor to the next in variable degrees.

When the very act of perceiving can change what is being perceived, even when using instruments, it then is not a case for exact measurement when the person using the instruments can change the observed simply by observing, which does show up in the measurement.

Now, expand the complexity of this by a zillion fold by taking it out of a lab situation and placing it in the real world, with every variety of human perception in every culture, and physical variation, and each perception of each person has a valid and changing effect upon the observed.

If an image is made of a thousand pixels, if each pixel was a person with an observation, then for the complete picture to manifest, it would take the addition of all of those observations to understand the whole picture.

Take the above and look at the UFO/phenomenal genre. Yes it’s like Herding Cats. But only because instead of one or a few people having the ‘right’ of it, its needs all of the people to make sense, all of the viewpoints to get the integral, untouched whole picture.

Not only that, I know it will take the entire planet’s viewpoints all put together to finally understand what is/has happened because this is a planetary story. This means all viewpoints are correct but the ability to understand will not come until they are all added together, because one point is not superior, or more correct than the another.

If there is one concept, one talent we need desperately to see reborn within our epistemologies and our population for the future, it would be synthesizers. We are truly in need of people who can take radically different ideas across the entire spectrum of ideas and be able to see how they all fit into a larger synthesis of the human story. This concept is anathema to every separate group out there because it has the potential to take power away from them.

We need to understand real power will come the day that we allow ourselves to combine our perceptions to form a much richer, more complex, interweaving of ideas to complete, not separate the picture of our lives.

Glinda: She wouldn’t have believed me. She had to learn it for herself.

Dorothy: Oh, will you help me? Can you help me?

Glinda: You don’t need to be helped any longer. You’ve always had the power to go back to Kansas.

Dorothy: I have?

Scarecrow: Then why didn’t you tell her before?

Glinda: She wouldn’t have believed me. She had to learn it for herself.

From <http://www.moviequotedb.com/movies/wizard-of-oz-the/quote_26339.html>

 

My birthday is December 21 (1953). So in 2012, I was on the lookout for things to really happen! I remember telling people up to that point that I thought the reason for all the catastrophism in thought; earthquakes and floods and the like was because that the ‘Event’ was going to be a consciousness shift that there were no words for, no way to even conceptualize, and so it was coming out as events in the very ground structure of our planet. That that was the only we way had to recognize how deeply profound and different this change in consciousness was going to be. We had to use analogy.

 

I stand by my statement. But add this caveat, the programming got in the way. Not that it didn’t happen, it did, we just don’t know it yet! Back in the 90’s when this idea was given to me, I didn’t know anything about ‘The Programming’, or that it even existed, or how it went through every fiber of every being on earth, or that every corporate and gov’t organization was involved. I just went by the principle that energy was additive and if I didn’t like something, I wasn’t lending my energy to it, like not going to see violent movies…etc. (ethical mental/emotional behavior) as best I could. I quit reading newspapers back in the 80’s and didn’t watch the news. To me, there was just a lot of dirty energy that made me recoil in these things – kinda like picking up dog poop in the yard, I kept my eye on it and dealt with it, but only dealt with it when necessary. I practiced ethical intent with my actions and thoughts, which meant that I had to become aware of them.

 

Then came 2012, and it’s not so much that it hit us like a ton of bricks, this consciousness change, but like waking up from a good long sleep where first you become aware of your body and stretch, and then contemplate going back to sleep but then decide it’s time to go do something so you slowly rise from the bed, stumble down stairs poke the coffee pot and stand there with your mind on hold till you get that first sip. Then, there are those ultra-annoying people who pop out of bed and hit the floor at full tilt boogey -, those are the ones who are out there telling us about everything like the morning news and there are the ones that take two cups of coffee before they can even speak (slow starters) but eventually we all get to it.

Time is a difficult idea for those who don’t live in it, so when I was given the understanding that it was a total consciousness revamping and not the end of the world I sorta assumed we’d all wake up and just understand. Actually though, this Great Awakening is taking some time, as well it should for beings who live in time. There are so many things we need to learn – just like a baby trying to fit into its body after its born. You have to learn to crawl before you can run. The upgrade was fully locked and loaded in potential on December 21st, 2012. It is up to us to actualize it.

We have had an artificial picture of reality shoved down our throats for centuries and now when the real nature of reality is being revealed it is hard to work with it in our minds, our hearts and our intensions. This new aspect to life in its correct and true light will all come out as we reconstruct our ideas about physics and life. But really, we have always been this way, we just will have to find it in ourselves, in our own time.

“You’ve always had the power, dear.”

 

That is how we will discover it’s right use and know its truth.

 

The information in the field is conscious. I didn’t say aware, but conscious. There is no-thing in the observable universe that is NOT conscious. For a thing to be conscious it must move and thereby create information in the field. We are information in the field as is all in creation. So are thoughts: information in the field – as the old theosophical adage goes “Energy Follows Thought”. A coherent thought can create even more information in the field, it can create by virtue of its intensity (frequency) and its intent(vector), changes in the local space time medium. These changes can either be physical or energetic, because there is no difference between energy and matter – just different configurations.

Intention – an inner direction, movement is different than attention – an outer movement or noticing. They are both vectors. They both handle a thought and give it direction.

Emotion or E-Motion is energy in motion or movement – a push – a vector, which would make thoughts a scalar packet/potential of information. A scalar potential in movement by a vector can and will find a sympathetic frequency in ratio to its own vibratory field.

The reason we do not understand the advanced high physics of the ancients is because we refuse to see thoughts as things and their relation to matter and the ability to alter the local space time using a set of geometries built to a matching frequency that can then be acted upon.

From: https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2018/05/01/the-crossover-between-phenomena-and-physics/

 

Our co-creative focused intent will no longer be able to be used against us to create the mind prison we were put in and we will relearn what it means to be human, all in good time.

Remember: “There’s no place like home.”

 

 

 

 

Control of the masses on a dark planet: religion

If we were conscious of our entire being, religion would not work on us. It would be non-applicable – couldn’t apply – at all.

IMO, religion is a set of rules imposed upon a person and a culture to limit the exploration of who they really are. To confine the person, blind the person by hard headed denial to only one limited proscribed reality by rules, guilt, confusion, fear and punishment. At least the forms of religion that are with us today.

I have no doubt, that religion started out as a set of precepts that allowed development of ideas and practices that would ultimately lead to direct inner experience of the greater person beyond the physical. If you practiced the rules, you would one day wake up. I also have no doubt, just like every other set of teachings that were meant to free human kind, it was turned inside out and perverted to control mankind.

There are examples of this throughout ancient history :

As such, the mere existence of the possibility of the use of such technologies in ancient times reveals not only the possible agendas of those elites, but also raises the vexing possibility that the great “revelations,” beginning with Abram/Abraham and Moses, and the religions founded upon them, were nothing but the productions of a technology, and to serve an agenda more or less hidden from those being manipulated.

Farrell, Joseph P.. Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and Their Hidden Agenda (Kindle Locations 152-155). Feral House. Kindle Edition.

 

“When we speak of suppression of evidence, we are not referring to scientific conspirators carrying out a satanic plot to deceive the public. Instead, we are talking about an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that appears quite innocuous but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view, in our opinion unjustifiably.” — Michael A. Cremo, “Introduction and Acknowledgements,” from The Hidden History of the Human Race, p. xvii.

Farrell, Joseph P.. Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and Their Hidden Agenda (Kindle Locations 183-187). Feral House. Kindle Edition.

 

The appearance of an organized spiritual technology, controlled by the priests, was attended in every country by a massive increase in human sacrifice. The Aztec massacres are notorious; the Druids in Ireland are said to have decimated the population. The innumerable sacrificial stones, carved with basins and channels for the flow of blood, and the traditional violent and bloody associations of so many ancient sites confirms what is recorded of the slaughter carried out by priests in the interests of necromancy. The practice of human sacrifice flourished in the ruins of the universal civilization. The secrets of spiritual invocation, once common property, had become exclusive to those appointed by the community to procure the seasonal renewal of fertility and interpret the will of god through the heavenly portents. The priests, thus established in a position of power, began, as do the members of all professions similarly placed, to extend their influence and activities and to make demands on the population for sacrificial offering. 96

Farrell, Joseph P.. The Grid of the Gods (Kindle Locations 2275-2283). SCB Distributors. Kindle Edition.

 

When and why this change showed up in the worlds organized population is the subject of some study by fearless researchers and there are many intriguing theories as to who and why

It is my contention that religion has been used on this planet to blind us to the greater reality that exists. Religion says look here, do it this way, no other way is right, and if you do look beyond these rules there will be very bad punishment for such behaviors and thinking. In other words, religion is a mind-cage. It has nothing what-so-ever to do with your connection to God (yes, big ‘G’, the real one).

religion (noun)

the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
“ideas about the relationship between science and religion”

This is why we are dealing with such nonsense as aliens being demons, fear of religious uprisings due to aliens walking among us, god-forbid they present a picture other than proscribed religious tenents when we can’t even agree on this planet about the subject. Consider also, that the people in power still want to use that ridiculous we-don’t-agree-on-who-is god to foment wars, reap huge financial benefits and continue controlling the peanut gallery…

There is no doubt in my mind that we have been dealing with a subversive takeover of this planet since before the flood – way before the flood. That after the flood, the group that was working for dominance got the upper hand and we are now living in their system of total control of the one thing that would save us from this domination: our Higher Selves, our Soul Aspect, the intangible human – all because of a bloody ideology set within us in a million variations. This is the biggest effing psy-op played on the planet of all time.

This is why the key to interspecies, ET, interdimensional communications lies in the ‘phenomenal, superconscious realm. This is also the key to the higher physics that would elucidate the missing pieces explaining how the intangible human, and things like hyperdimensional travel and zero point energy work. It is also, IMO, the thing we MUST learn before we can actually emerge from this planet and become part of the larger picture.

Until we break through this thought-barrier, we are living in the dusk – barely able to apprehend, let alone understand the real driving forces behind who we are and what makes the universe tick. The main component to everything is consciousness and we have been sorely limited in our pursuit and understanding of even the most basic principles of it.

Consciousness IS the Unified Field