Recess…

Imagine a note ascending from a low, so low that it rumbles not only your bones but the very substance of matter its self, rising in pitch higher all the way up into notes so high they turn from sound into light and then pass into something else. This frequency range is the entire underlying field that supports all of the universe, both seen and unseen, felt and unfelt.

Within this vast array of vibration are different tones – just like going up a keyboard, or guitar fret. Within the range of a guitar neck are all the notes that it can know, that it can produce, but as we are all aware of, that is not all the notes that exist.

Now take this metaphor and use it in the framework of dimensions. We, in 3D have a very finite range of frequency that we know, perceive and respond to. Science tell us that there is much that exists that we cannot see, but is there. Science has given us radio, and microwaves, and we can neither see or hear them, but they do exist because technology uses those frequency ranges and gives us cell phones, microwaves and radios in our cars and radar. We are finding the alien metals are a wave guide to terra hertz frequency, a frequency so very high we couldn’t measure it till 10 years ago, and part of a frequency that, when we wrap ourselves in technology created from it, raises the frequency high enough that the very low gravitational frequency is negated and we can float stuff…

These frequencies INTERPENETRATE each other, or technology could not be fashioned to use them.

We humans occupy a frequency range. We can see and perceive a very little bit of the vastness of the whole range of vibration on either side of our main set of frequencies, these being only a range of notes that exist in the entire vastness of all creation. We are not unique in this vast range of frequencies. Other lives, intelligences, forms, exist out of our frequency range to perceive, but in the same space, interpenetrating even what we think is our living space. And we do not know them, we do not feel them, we do not see them.

And the creatures of each range of frequencies are what create the reality of those ranges, so each range has a part of each reality within it from the deepest note of creation all the way to the highest note. It is the creature’s perception of its realm that creates its reality.

However we can, because the whole frequency range that is this universe is one vast unity, become aware of the other frequency ranges and the creatures with in those ranges by the use of one tool, consciousness.

And who we meet when we go venturing in consciousness is completely dependent on our intent, who we are as a person, and what we are looking for. Our intensions, and therefore our conscious mental action of a thought are where we go – the frequency of all three, emotion, intention and thought will produce a harmonic resonance with a frequency range and we will find what we have tuned our will to.

This is no great mystery, it has been known by adepts of every culture throughout time. It is the origin of all our dreams and nightmares, folklore and high myth. It is the ancient high wisdom and yet it is so simple that is has become unreachable in its complexity.

But, people are beginning to remember. People are beginning to be able to stand slightly outside of the frequency range that we have been taught is an impossibility.. People are beginning to extend their curiosity into areas of mystery and are re-acquainting themselves with the realms of all creation.

 

Ok, the point: no phenomena is separate, or can be separated from each other. Within ranges of frequencies, their overtones and their harmonics lie other realms, other ideas and other realties, and especially other beings. Just because they are not from here, doesn’t make them any smarter, or that much different from us. Not all UFO’s are good and not all are bad, same for the occupants of said craft. Not all lights in the sky are UFO’s, and not all are from this frequency band (dimension) and not all orbs are good or bad in their intensions toward us.

We tend to attract what we are looking for, so it finds us a lot of the time (theory of harmonics). If you meet up with something scary or negative, look inside and see what brought it to you, then give it a hug and send it on its way. It’s all about frequency matching and harmonics (harmonics like in a chord in music, some notes sound great together and other notes sound horrible).

But back to the point: CONSCIOUSNESS. It IS the unified field. You are a divine fractal fragment of the one source out playing in the frequencies seeing what you can see and creating what you can create, learning about creation itself and having a damned good time doing it. And until time runs out and snaps that fragmentation back together like shattering glass in reverse, its recess time…

Advertisements

50 Years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z8LHf9J6PQ

 

LAFORGE: There she is. She’s beautiful. …All right. Take a look.

COCHRANE: Well, well, well. What have we got here? …I love a good peep show.

(Cochrane looks through a telescope and sees the Enterprise orbiting)

COCHRANE: Ha, ha, ha. That’s a trick. Ha, ha, ha. How’d you do that?

LAFORGE: It’s your telescope.

TROI: That’s our ship. The Enterprise.

COCHRANE: And Lily’s up there right now?

TROI (OC): That’s right.

COCHRANE: Can I talk to her?

RIKER: We’ve lost contact with the Enterprise. We don’t know why yet.

COCHRANE: So, what is it you want me to do?

RIKER: Simple. Conduct your warp flight tomorrow morning just as you planned.

COCHRANE: Why tomorrow morning?

RIKER: Because at eleven o’clock an alien ship will begin passing through this solar system.

COCHRANE: Alien? You mean extra-terrestrials. More bad guys?

TROI: Good guys. They’re on a survey mission. They have no interest in Earth. …Too primitive.

COCHRANE: Oh!

RIKER: Doctor, tomorrow morning when they detect the warp signature from your ship and realize that humans have discovered how to travel faster than light, they decide to alter their course and make first contact with Earth, right here.

COCHRANE: Here?

LAFORGE: Sir, it’s actually over there.

RIKER: It is one of the pivotal moments in human history, Doctor. You get to make first contact with an alien race, and after you do, everything begins to change.

LAFORGE: Your theories on warp drive allow fleets of starships to be built and mankind to start exploring the Galaxy.

TROI: It unites humanity in a way no one ever thought possible when they realize they’re not alone in the universe. Poverty, disease, war. They’ll all be gone within the next fifty years.

RIKER: But unless you make that warp flight tomorrow morning before eleven fifteen, none of it will happen.

COCHRANE: And you people, you’re all astronauts, … on some kind of star trek?

LAFORGE: Look, Doc, I know this is a lot for you to take in, but we’re running out of time here.

RIKER: We need your help. …What do you say?

COCHRANE: Why not?

 

From <http://www.chakoteya.net/movies/movie8.html>


This is why I LOVE Star Trek. It is a symbol of all that would-could/can-will be for the human race. What better thing to do on all-hallows-eve than to binge watch Star Trek movies?? In the movie ‘First Contact’ I was utterly galvanized when Troi says: “It unites humanity in a way no one ever thought possible when they realize they’re not alone in the universe. Poverty, disease, war. They’ll all be gone within the next fifty years.”   I got that energy explosion in the pit of my stomach and my jaw dropped because that is exactly where we are right now. Should the tech I ranted about in my last article be released, in 50 years we will have solved the world’s problems and we will be that galactic race, finally.

I found the entire movie prophetic – in the fight against the Borg being a metaphor for the fight coming against transhumanism, an example of the right use of technology in the way the federation used it, in the stand a righteous man must make against a seemingly stronger force (Borg) to the extent of sacrificing his life for a moral philosophy, as we must all be ready to do, because the Borg symbolize the deepstate/cabal/elite/invasion force we are as a planet pitted against at this moment. We are at that tipping point. Really.

For over 40 years I have dreamt a secret dream that one day all that you see in Star Trek will become us. That the show was my perfect blue print for the future. And millions of people have agreed with me. There is no better structured creative dream out there for our future. As I have said before, give us a bone and we will worry it until we bring it to fruition, and this particular dream has the biggest, staunchest following of any creation that I personally know of. It is the most profoundly prophetic creation we have ever made.

It gives me hope for the future.

Technology – a rant

If, for the last century all the technological discoveries that we would need for the future have been discouraged by academia, government and the controllers of the planet, but do exist already and have been developed by people from the earth, then demanding the release of said technologies is NOT asking to be saved, nor does it have anything to do with wanting a savior to do the work for us. It appears we, the people of earth, have already done this, and if the suppression of intelligence, the suppression of inventors, the suppression of true original thinkers had not been done, we would already have these technologies and the world wouldn’t be crashing down around us. We made these technologies – we created them. They are ours, and we have also paid for them in spades. It is our right to use them.

Because whether the UFO question is real, whether the alien question is real, whether the interdimensional question is real, whether the elites, hidden controllers – call them what you want are real, has nothing to do with this. This is about saving our planet, saving it from those few who would destroy it. This is about saving us as a viable race, saving our children and having a place they can grow and thrive in, saving every type of life that exists on this planet from sure extinction. The technologies already exist to save the planet and every last soul on it.

We are being purposefully led to keep our heads buried in the sand until it is too late to do anything about this mess, or save the situation. I have said before that this was a millennia old plan, that whoever invaded did it very slowly – almost on a molecular level – if that is possible – such that the range and scope of the invasion has taken far longer than our memory has room to hold in current lore.

That invasion is almost complete, yet here we are almost at the eleventh hour finally waking up and noticing what is happening and instead of powering up to clean out the mess, we are uselessly squabbling amongst ourselves over idiotly insane and stupid matters. But, lest we all forget, that is part of the plan, to keep us so engaged in our separated ideologies that we in all out hubris and ego fight each other instead of the invading force.

The technologies that really do exist would blow the minds of everybody on the planet. It is time to just get over it and stand up and demand they be released to the public for the salvation of the planet.

The season of the rant: A Piece of the Action

This seems to be the season of the rant, so here is some more of my 2 cents.

IMO we, earthlings are simple, give us bone to chew and it will infiltrate through the substrata of our cultures and appear, as somebody will want it enough to invent it.. Give us a new idea and we, if we like it, will run with it and make it real. Need I point out how many devices were created from the TV show Star Trek that are now real? In some cases this pays off, in others, not so much.

Now, when you are looking at the effects of an extreme disinformation campaign like the one surrounding the topic of UFO’s where (gee let me repeat myself for the third time)

We all know about the ‘Truth Embargo’, we all know we have been lied to officially.

So really the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.

You wind up with a reaction that causes

ex·trem·ism  /ikˈstrēˌmizəm/

noun

noun: extremism; plural noun: extremisms

the holding of extreme political or religious views; fanaticism.
“the dangers of religious extremism”

Extremism means, literally, “the quality or state of being extreme” or the “advocacy of extreme measures or views”. The term is primarily used in a political or religious sense, to refer to an ideology that is considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of society. It can also be used in an economic context. Wikipedia

 

Although we who are rather embedded in this UFO issue see this as a huge issue, it could be just one of several tactics being used on the planet at this moment to destabilize society of any kind. One of the most insidious programs to break down and restructure the way relationships are conducted from person to person all the way up through the global arena has been:

Postmodernism: a broad movement that developed in the mid- to late-20th century across philosophy, the arts, architecture, and criticism and that marked a departure from modernism.[1][2][3] The term has also more generally been applied to the historical era following modernity and the tendencies of this era.[4] (In this context, “modern” is not used in the sense of “contemporary”, but merely as a name for a specific period in history.)

While encompassing a wide variety of approaches, postmodernism is generally defined by an attitude of skepticism, irony, or rejection toward the meta-narratives and ideologies of modernism, often calling into question various assumptions of Enlightenment rationality.[5] Consequently, common targets of postmodern critique include universalist notions of objective reality, morality, truth, human nature, reason, language, and social progress.[5] Postmodern thinkers frequently call attention to the contingent or socially-conditioned nature of knowledge claims and value systems, situating them as products of particular political, historical, or cultural discourses and hierarchies.[5] Accordingly, postmodern thought is broadly characterized by tendencies to self-referentiality, epistemological and moral relativism, pluralism, subjectivism, and irreverence.[5]

Postmodern critical approaches gained purchase in the 1980s and 1990s, and have been adopted in a variety of academic and theoretical disciplines, including cultural studies, philosophy of science, economics, linguistics, architecture, feminist theory, and literary criticism, as well as art movements in fields such as literature and music. Postmodernism is often associated with schools of thought such as deconstruction and post-structuralism, as well as philosophers such as Jean-François Lyotard, Jacques Derrida, and Fredric Jameson. Some philosophers have criticized the term.   From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism>

(I got this idea from listening to Richard Dolan and Micah Hanks)

And what we are seeing above is the result of: the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years. In other words, the kick back from being lied to – especially if you’re are not sure just when or where that occurred is to call absolutely everything suspect. The second thing is then to question the motives behind absolutely everything. The third thing that happens is … Paranoia. In a word.

Which really, in one way, is a good thing or none of us would have ever found out about things like monsanto (not capitalizing the word, as it doesn’t deserve that honor), or big pharma, or vaccines, or education, the stealing of social security and then taxing it, or, for heaven sake ancient history (its freaking endless)or any of the other myriad ways we have been lied to and manipulated.

This is part of the problem going on in the UFO genre right now between all the little guys, in the chat rooms and the twitterverse, or FB, the mood is murderous. What makes all of us think that when every other strata of society has been targeted that ours wouldn’t be is fairly insane. It has been from the beginning and that is a fact we have to take on board and work with and around to gain any real grip of some assemblance of truth. Like it or lump it. The common narrative is that: Everything has been weaponized against us.

Which is also why they can also use the idea of a savior against us. Just like a cargo cult, we want ET to come and save us. Which IMO most certainly will NOT happen. Mainly because of the real prime directive. Trust me, if we as kids can think of this idea and extrapolate the need for it, it probably is real in one form or another.

Which reminds me of:

“A Piece of the Action”, a second season episode of the American science fiction television series Star Trek, first broadcast on January 12, 1968; its repeat on August 30, 1968, was the last episode to air in the 8:30 pm time slot on Friday nights. It is episode #46, production #49, written by David P. Harmon and Gene L. Coon, and directed by James Komack.

In the comedic episode, the Enterprise visits a planet with an Earth-like 1920s gangster culture, with Runyonesque dialog and costumes. From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Piece_of_the_Action_(Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series)>

Returning to a planet last visited by an Earth ship 100 years earlier, the Enterprise finds a planet that has based its culture on the Chicago gangsters of the 1920s. Since the Horizon‘s visit was before the Federation’s Prime Directive against non-interference, Kirk, Spock and McCoy are concerned about what effects the Horizon‘s crew may have had on the Iotian culture which was just beginning industrialization at the time and had a knack for imitation. The three beam down to find a culture resembling that of Chicago in the 1920s. They are immediately greeted by two men dressed as gangsters who threaten them with Tommy guns. From <http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/A_Piece_of_the_Action_(episode)> And why? All because the Horizon’s crew left a book behind on Chicago in the roaring 20’s.

This is a clear example of a cargo cult.

Cargo cults often develop during a combination of crises. Under conditions of social stress, such a movement may form under the leadership of a charismatic figure. This leader may have a “vision” (or “myth-dream”) of the future, often linked to an ancestral efficacy (“mana“) thought to be recoverable by a return to traditional morality.[1][3] This leader may characterize the present state as a dismantling of the old social order, meaning that social hierarchy and ego boundaries have been broken down.[4] From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult> (italics mine)

From what I can see, that’s pretty much the state of things down here for us ‘ground-pounders’. But now we want ‘A Piece of the Action’ too.

 

 

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

Of Cages

The fights we are seeing going on right now echo two things in my mind, well maybe three.
1. the dark magic is reminiscent of the Jack Parsons/Crowley/Hubbard stuff from the 1940’s repeating and the magical alchemy of money BMMS (lol – Babylonian Money Magic System) (2)

2. the ‘two groups fighting resemble the light and the dark brotherhoods of the mystery schools (who believe it or not folks are being controlled by this larger force such that they are both too busy to see that third force)

3. this all kinda goes back to the survivors of the great cosmic war when they blew up a planet, wound up here and have never stopped creating MESS. (of which number two is only the latest iteration)

The cult mentality of all of it is even more concerning. Information on cults:

Humans desire comfort, and in a fearful and uncertain world many turn to cults because they tend to promote exactly that. Jon-Patrik Pedersen, a psychologist at CalTech, has pointed out that cult leaders often make promises that are totally unattainable, but also offered by no other group in society. Such things might include financial security, total health, constant peace of mind, and eternal life — the things every human desires at the deepest level. (savior mentality)

Cults satisfy the human desire for absolute answers.

Those with low self-esteem are more likely to be persuaded by a cult environment.

New recruits are “love bombed.”

Women are more likely than men to join a cult.

Many cult members have rejected religion.

Cults maintain their power by promoting an “us vs. them” mentality.

Cult leaders are masters at mind control.

Ways in which leaders gain control over cult members vary, but some popular methods include:

Public Humiliation: New cult members may be “love bombed” shortly after their arrival, but once they are established members, cult leaders often maintain emotional control through various exercises meant to publicly humiliate a member. One such method involves someone sitting in a chair surrounded by other members, at which time they are required to admit their recent failures, base thoughts, shortcomings, etc.

Self-Incrimination: A favorite tactic of the infamous cult leader Jim Jones, self-incrimination requires cult members to provide their leader with written statements detailing their individual fears and mistakes. The cult leader can then use these statements to shame individual members publicly.

Brainwashing: Cult leaders are known to repeat various lies and distortions until members find it difficult to distinguish between reality and cult life.

Paranoia: To maintain a false sense of comfort, cults often rely on paranoia tactics. Cult leaders convince their victims that a group, their families, and/or the government is out to get them, but that the cult can provide safety. Once a cult member comes to the conclusion that their families and country cannot keep them safe, they begin to worship and put all of their faith in their cult leader. Jim Jones was especially skilled at this mind-control trick. He would encourage members to spy on each other, and consistently spoke through loudspeakers at all hours of the day so that cult members would hear his voice whether awake or asleep.

Cult members often have no idea they’re in a cult.

Cult life can have a dangerous and lasting effect.

He specifically mentions that the “symptoms of temporal lobe epilepsy are similar to those seen or reported as resulted from cult conversions:

increased irritability

loss of libido or altered sexual interest

ritualism

compulsive attention to detail

mystical states

humorlessness and sobriety

heightened paranoia

From <https://www.onlinepsychologydegree.info/what-to-know-about-the-psychology-of-cults/>

In case you choose to say, ‘Not Me’…

Before jumping into the specifics, I’d like to briefly discuss an insidious psychological process called the “Self-serving Bias.” This bias leads us to believe that we are immune to the influences that affect the rest of humanity. I run into this bias all the time when describing my work on resistance to persuasion: “I think it’s great that you’re trying to help people resist television ads. Of course, TV ads don’t persuade me…”

The self-serving bias has been demonstrated countless times: the majority of Americans believe they are smarter and better looking than average; most drivers (even those hospitalized for accidents) believe themselves more skilled than the average driver; most smog-breathing Los Angelinos believe themselves healthier than their neighbors; most college students believe they will outlive their predicted age of death by 10 years, and so on.

The most ironic example of the self-serving bias that I’ve ever heard appeared in a social psychology paper written by one of Kelton’s students. After the self-serving bias had been discussed in class, this student wrote:

“I don’t understand why they say the self-serving bias is universal. I mean, I see it in other people, but I personally don’t have a self-serving bias.”

I’m not kidding, the student really wrote that!

From <http://www.workingpsychology.com/cultdef.html>
What do you do with information you want to have hidden and keep hidden? You swear those who know to secrecy with ideas like the destruction of mankind because mankind cannot handle the power and importance of this information and you hide it behind mystery schools. (1) This causes the information to land in two select groups. One that will have a moral and ethical bent towards the greatest good, and one that will keep and use the information for their own advancement (breakaways and ppl like those who run CERN and HARRP)
IMO we are looking at a worldwide psy-op (cult) that nobody really knows the full extent of, with even the mystery schools, prominent and excellent researchers, governments and alphabet soups and all the others being played as useful-idiots.

We are all being played.

When the

‘…only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.’

is the only thing we can be sure of, then the world is operating as one giant cult.
And instead of recognizing this most people are acting like captives in a cage scrambling for the biggest scraps that land through the bars, while diligent souls who have real information are drowned out by insignificant and useful idiots such that the mass confusion creates its own control system. Problem solved for the cage tenders.
OMG!!!
(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m2Qvh85QBY&list=PLNfJkzByQRux01gvudalzEGUgoH496qay

(2) https://youtu.be/r3-wlD8LOM4BMMS

With Egg on my Face

I sit before this electronic piece of equipment that is my doorway to the greater world, with egg on my face….

Meaning : ‘To have/caught with egg on your face‘ means to be made to look foolish or to be embarrassed. Origin: “Random House Dictionary of American Slang, Vol. 1, A-G” by J.E. Lighter (Random House, New York, 1994): “have egg on (one’s) face — to look foolish or be embarrassed. https://www.quora.com/What-does-caught-with-egg-on-your-face-mean-and-what-is-its-…

It’s an old idiom, so there’s what it means. Yep, I’m embarrassed for several reasons. One, because I unwittingly let myself get caught in the ongoing hooha I was disparaging in my oh so acerbic opines, and two because the more I felt around inside about this issue, the more I understood it as a lesson in being kind, and collecting all the data I could before I did opine and make an ass of myself. Literally. Lastly, it was a kick in my morally oh so righteous ass that askes ‘Since when did you walk a mile in their shoes?’

So, I’m gonna dust myself off, get up, try again with maybe a little more empathy in my heart aaaand, opine again. This kind of character bashing used to be called slander and defamation of character and back before the internet when we used to have to print stuff like this on paper to make a point, could get you thrown in jail for it. It is one thing to report a verified fact, and another just to give your opinions.

I am guilty of having a bad attitude, justifiable or not to pin it on anyone else as their fault is really immature. I’m 65 – I should know better. Really. I am guilty of listening to others without doing the research – which in this case would have saved my sorry ass from looking like a sorry ass – and forming an opinion on yet another opinion. Just shoot me now. (I suppose this stems from being angry at others for doing it and thusly having the karmic pleasure of doing it myself so I could understand why… ahem)

Here’s the thing. We all complain about what a mess this field is from the half-truths linked to the truth, from the outright dis-information to the lies being almost indistinguishable from the truth.

true /tro͞o/

in accordance with fact or reality.

rightly or strictly so called; genuine.

said when conceding a point in argument or discussion.
accurate or exact.

(interestingly this was an old German word for truce )

We all know about the ‘Truth Embargo’, we all know we have been lied to officially.

So really the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.

So you see, how all of us can get testy. Just a bit… the whole game has been crafted so well, and is so insidious, that we are all ( I was going to say a bit, but this qualifies for full frontal) paranoid.

For What It Is Worth

Buffalo Springfield

There’s something happening here

What it is ain’t exactly clear

There’s a man with a gun over there

Telling me I got to beware

I think it’s time we stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

There’s battle lines being drawn

Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong

Young people speaking their minds

Getting so much resistance from behind

It’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

What a field-day for the heat

A thousand people in the street

Singing songs and carrying signs

Mostly say, hooray for our side

It’s s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Paranoia strikes deep

Into your life it will creep

It starts when you’re always afraid

You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, now, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Songwriters: Stephen Stills

For What It Is Worth lyrics © Warner/Chappell Music, Inc

So here we are. In the mist of another revolution, one not so fun as the sixties and way more important. What are we going to do about it? How are we going to handle it? What kind of example will we set for those who will see this as it transforms the world we live in. We need to get better at this. We really do.

I really do.

To weigh the measure of a heart in a court of law

I give my testimony not for a judgement, but to share for any other person out there who might find humor or ease in my silly words. They are true. True to my heart, true to my experience but unprovable. Others talk and write about things true to their hearts. If people like them enough to pay for them, then why not?

We are in a miraculous time when our own stories can reach many. It is very sad indeed when because somebody doesn’t like your story they need to ‘crucify’ your person. We are in a very sad time indeed when stories need to garner money for the cost of living. Once upon a time traveling bards were respected and given succor for their stories before the hearth of peoples simply for the pleasure of the story.

How have we managed to work ourselves into a corner where such luxury can now wind us up behind bars, or have your heart measured and judged before anyone? In Egypt only Osiris could do that.

The Judgement of Osiris.

The `heart’ of the soul was handed over to Osiris who placed it on a great golden scale balanced against the white feather of Ma’at, the feather of truth on the other side. From <https://www.google.com/search

Now we in our great hubris have decided we are qualified for the task. The government and/or our laws-du-jour have made it possible to not only go after someone for ‘words’ but to limit the scope of information actually allowed out to the public.

As any system of facts and research advance in society there comes a time of reckoning, stepping into the legal world. If the SSP is going to be realized as an actual fact (not just testimony) founded on research and proof, then this knowledge having existed prior to CG and Associates cannot be trade marked by them. The actual fact that many years’ worth of presentation and research are verifiable in the public domain makes them ‘untrademarkable’ (if that is a word…), because they can be seen several years before CG’s use of them – especially the words Secret Space Program.

This will boil down to where was it verifiably heard and presented first as ‘prior art’. Bob Dean may have alluded – actually said those words in a Kerry Cassidy interview in 2000 called ‘Bringing in the Light’. That evidence is out there in spades. The first Secret Space Program Conference held in the US in 2014 had a list of researchers well known in this topic as the very best:

Mark McCandlish

Michael Schratt

Joseph P Farrell

Catherine Austin Fitts

Richard Dolan

Robert Morningstar

John Rappoport

Carol Rosin

and every one of their talks is on you tube for you to see. There was a second conference in 2015 which is also available on you tube. One of the very first Secret Space Program Conferences in the world was in Amsterdam in 2011…

IMO this might cause CG a bit of a problem because once they prove the information was out there, they will also have a solid case for plagiarism because no other research was sited in using said information…

Just for a bit of information on what IP is (intellectual property):


What does it mean to steal intellectual property?

Intellectual theft is stealing or using without permission someone else’s intellectual property. … Intellectual property is protected by patent for inventions, trademarks for commercial marks or branded products, and copyrights on creative pursuits such as music, photo, poems.

 

What is considered intellectual property?

Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind: inventions; literary and artistic works; and symbols, names and images used in commerce. Intellectual property is divided into two categories: Industrial Property includes patents for inventions, trademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications.

 

What does a licensing agreement allow?

A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor.

(so, you have to pay to use the term SSP and CG would set for life..)

 

What are the 4 types of intellectual property?

The four types of intellectual property include:

  • Trade Secrets.
  • Trademarks.
  • Copyrights, and.
  • Patents.

 

Intellectual Property Protection. Intellectual Property Protection is protection for inventions, literary and artistic works, symbols, names, and images created by the mind. Learn how you can protect your intellectual property by using: Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets, and Copyrights.

(key phrase here – CREATED BY THE MIND – that immediately implies that CG’s story is NOT fact, but story. Have we ever copyrighted historical facts before?)

 

Copyright. Copyright is a legal means of protecting an author’s work. It is a type of intellectual property that provides exclusive publication, distribution, and usage rights for the author. … Many different types of content can be protected by copyright. Examples include books, poems, plays, songs, films, and artwork.

 

The importance of protecting intellectual property. Intellectual property (IP) rights are valuable assets for your business – possibly among the most important it possesses.

(taking CG’s SSP OUT of the realm of research and into the realm of business. Interesting side note is the ‘fair use’ act that allows material to be sited and used in print and in video for purposes of education. Where does academia cross over into the world of IP??)

 

Copyright infringement is the use of works protected by copyright law without permission, infringing certain exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, display or perform the protected work, or to make derivative works.

(can research be considered derivative works?)

 

(If so, the fines could be heavy)

FBI Anti-Piracy Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.

 

Thus my article called ‘Really???’ because we are still measuring the ethic and integrity of the use of certain words, so, all I have to say is – ‘Oh!! GROW UP!’ We are all missing the point here by allowing ourselves to be misdirected by all this caca.

 

But oh my, that’s the point, isn’t it?

 

Sources

Intellectual Theft: Everything You Need to Know – UpCounsel  https://www.upcounsel.com/intellectual-theft

https://ipcopy.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/new-to-ip-heres-10-facts-about-intellectual-property/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDjE9ME452c&list=PLxpYawT00V40XgkYg-YY3S0lpmgKtZtYD

https://youtu.be/4wRhONQq5J0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzCHN…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wRhONQq5J0&t=3927s>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tinkerbelle

One of the things you have to learn as a magician is how to call spirits, bind them and get them to work for you. To me that’s kind of like buying on credit. If you don’t have the cash, don’t do it, because you will pay for all of it with tons of interest… just like the golden rule (do unto others) it’s a good idea to realize these other beings have their own lives and let them be! Now, if you are the kind of person who has things interfering in your life even if you didn’t call them, it’s good to have a few tricks up your sleeve.

In my world, I keep my house – for the lack of a better word – warded. Those wards are all light structures that I have made up in my mind and placed around the house. Occasionally, I have to reinforce them – re think them, boof them up a bit, but they are quite efficient in keeping my psychic environment pretty and sparkling.

The trick is all based on intent and heart power (emotion). White light is one of the most beautiful dazzling lovely things ever. Back in my teens I had found a book about playing with the light. A simple little book, I can’t even remember the name of it and one of the games it suggested was to lob white light balls at people and to see them break apart in a million sparkles onto the person – randomly. I practiced that a lot because it was easy and fun and it did no harm, then I started lobbing them on people who were driving and being buttheads and that worked… it was literally amazing to watch.

I found that like zero point energy, white light was endless, free and perfect. Things in my box of ideas grew from there. It was the beginning of my awareness education about how things work. As a child I had been an easy mark to terrify – and terrified I was, nightly. As a matter of fact, that situation led to my first contact, but I’ve written about that already. By the time I was into my teens somehow, somewhere this idea of white light had snuck into my cosmology and I began to discover it. Now it is really second nature like in my article “411” . But it all started with playing with the energy.

I don’t know what you call the stuff I do, and I don’t want to be pigeon-holed so I don’t care. I just know that it works. I live by the my-space, your-space – I won’t bother you if you won’t bother me rule… and it works. Between beings of all kinds, the ‘do unto others’ concept is golden. Period.

What I appear to be is a Tinkerbelle. Oh well… that’s in my energy. In my real life I am the crone. Believe me when I say energy and intent rule this reality, so parse your field carefully.


This is a gift. Use it. Teach it. Spread it.

I Am The Light is six statements long.

 It is the strongest protection that I have ever known and used.

I need nothing else. It can be used personally, around you, around family members and other people, pets, plants, land and vehicles. It can be extended through time for days and weeks. It is the MOST amazing piece of consciousness software I have ever encountered.

The visuals with this are what I eventually saw in my mind’s eye after using this powerful formula. The visuals can be worked with changed or discarded as seen fit.

The words create a vibratory shield that is incredibly powerful in its protection. (1)

It was given to me freely years ago, and I give it to you.

 

I AM the Light.

The Light is with in me.

The Light moves throughout me.

The Light surrounds me.

The Light Protects me.

I AM THE LIGHT!

https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2014/12/02/i-am-the-light/

This is actual energetic technology.  It is very simple.

Frequency:

Just say it EXACTLY as written. The frequency of each spoken statement is the crucial point. So if you are saying it silently to yourself, enunciate each word clearly, hear it ring out clearly as you speak in your head.

 

Sound:

Each statement has an effect. I am a visual person, a visual learner, so I got pictures in my head once I memorized it and could turn my attention inside without reading it. Because each statement builds on the next, you want to say them in order. ALWAYS. Just as it is. As you use this, you will begin to ‘notice’ with your own self what it does.

 

Inner vision, Mind’s Eye:

Lately, I have noticed that for me, each statement calls into being the light on a dimensional level with each chakra… I think. When said personally. The Light moves, has action and has purpose according to the spoken word. Words have vast power, hook them up with intent to the light and it is amazing.

 

Working in Wholeness:

On one hand I think it is as all light is, an electromagnetic effect.

You create a field of vast potential.

When you use this for other than you, instead of saying ‘I’ use the name of the person, pet, plant, vehicle or place.  White in my eyes is all colors, so it holds the greatest potential and the greatest good.

 

I redid  the fourth fifth and sixth images this am to bring them into sync with what I am now knowing, but my graphics software is nowhere close to being able to letting me visualize it the way I really see it in my head. Paltry example…. but as close as I could get.

 

Those illustrations are over 20 years old, and they have changed for me. The light stays white throughout the entire sequence, on the fourth statement, ‘The Light Surrounds Me’ it moves counter clockwise like a torus over the outer sphere while running straight up the inner column. On the last statement it is just blindly huge.

https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/adendum-i-am-the-light/