To what purpose?

About Tuesday, I began waking up with a knowing that it was over. Whatever ‘it’ was. That everything was ok, and was going to be ok. Nothing in the outer world matched my feeling. The CV#’s had only begun to shift down and there was hype about everything, supplies, ventilators as killers, chipped vaccines, tests that gave you the ‘V’ and mandated testing, mass graves in New York, alien invasions: in fact, the theories had only gotten crazier, wilder and spun further out from reality.

I’m talking about the reality in front of your eyes, the one where you step outside and everything clicks back into focus. The swimmingly weird and wacky on line world in one second being decimated by the truth of the world before your eyes, the trees, the sun, the flowers and the hum of life. All it takes is to stand outside and inhale one breath and ‘BAM’ reality is there and you are immersed in the real truth. That is something that cannot be denied – maybe that is why they want us inside?

There is a ground swell of ppl who are beginning to understand how the fear-porn idea works and are waking up to how tired they are of being made to feel that the world is their enemy. There are a great many people who are beginning to feel gratitude for what is right under their noses, who are praying prayers of hope and gratitude for all the right reasons in their lives. There are a great many who are beginning to question what they are hearing in the news, question the political agenda behind this ‘plandemic’ and exactly what is being done to them – esp. after the 911 lesson.

In one way this seems like a numbers game to me – if just enough people could get together for a world meditation, if just enough people could wake up, if just enough people would believe in the CV, if just enough people would get angry enough at the current shenanigans, if just enough people would believe in the inflated CV numbers, on and on, ad nauseum.

Its like there is a tipping point in people banding together that is a magic bullet, that would sway things to one way or another, and everybody is out to grab as many souls in their camp as they can. A weighted numbers game… and its like it doesn’t matter what you say, so long as you can create group cohesion – tell the people what ever you need to, no matter how outrageous it is, just so you get them on your side and keep them by what ever tactics necessary.

There is strength in numbers. There always has been. Numbers have created nations. And a well known tactic has always been “Divide and Conquer”. Presidents have spoken:

During a speech before the United Nations in 1987, President Ronald Reagan spoke longingly for the world unity that would happen if aliens invaded Earth.

He said:

“Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.”

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/flashback-reagans-vision-unifying

This ‘Plandemic”, however, has gone the other way in its effect on us – on purpose – IMO. Why? Well, that’s up to the analysts to figure out, because I have no idea, but we are divided more than ever now. Conversely my first instinct is to NOT be divided. To let your neighbor believe as they will, but realize we are all connected as we are all made of the elements of this earth, in it’s infinite variations of that life and we are all part of a web of glowing, pulsing energy so interconnected that no idea should be able to separate us – except by our choice – and then only mentally because what separates us are only ideas.

AND

We are being divided with purpose and aim and driven apart for a, or a multitude of reasons. We are being told to stay inside and not reconnect with nature because that totally dispels this divided feeling. My instinct is to ask why and go beyond ‘divide-and-conquer’/’strength-in-numbers’ thinking. It is almost like they wish to cleave us from the energetic bond we have with earth, pry us loose from the planetary connection and our sense of humanity.

To what purpose?

The Mobius Lie

Fear Porn

Hope Porn

Porno graphy

We have dropped the “graphy” – meaning picture, off of those words.

Pornography:

Gk: porne, prostitute: bought and sold

pernani: to sell from the root variant *per, to traffic in, to sell+

graphia: to write

1859 variant Fr: obscene pictures

Today it means to compromise your internal values for some sort of gain, to take beauty and strength and sell it.

When we ‘buy’ into Fear Porn we are selling our strength.

When we ‘buy’ into Hope Porn we sell our heart.

Because: we are caught in fear and we want hope.

“I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Frank Herbert, Dune

Everything is ‘graphique’ today, social media, news, TV, and a lot of it is pornographic or obscene. Not only that, it is unavoidable, in our faces. We have no control over what we read or what we see, it is pernicious (having a harmful effect, especially in a gradual or subtle way). It works its way into our awareness through repeated exposure.

It is meant to be shocking and ugly – it is meant to destroy our souls, it is force feeding us ugliness in order to overcome our innate goodness. It is meant to shred our inner sense of self and story and replace it with its own narrative, repeated over and over until its litany is all we can see.

And we know it is mostly lies so we keep watching, trying to catch the lie, but lies are twists and turns meant to focus us back into the lie, not the truth. They are a closed loop system – and to be able to see the lie, you have to stand outside it, not in it. A lie is a Mobius.

I direct you to Jon Rappoport’s blog should you wish to stand outside the Mobius of this latest lie – to see the actual lie – https://nomorefakenews.com/ .

Lies can kill. They do every day. They are the camouflage of a weapon of mass destruction. In this particular lie ‘they’ have given it an unpredictable element – time. It can live outside a host for a much longer time than normal and has a longer asymptomatic time inside a host before it is evident. ‘They’ have fucked with time. Otherwise we would be looking at a standard influenza. (read https://nomorefakenews.com/ )

“Don’t fall for the mass panic. You are a sovereign being who gets to take ownership of your health, life, and vibration. Don’t get distracted by the fear programming that convinces you that you’re powerless.”

D.a. Wills

Fear is the mind killer and it is time related too. The longer you wait, the longer you look, consume, the more powerful it becomes. Better to stand outside the lie and observe and not participate. Refuse to lend your energy and life force to a destructive Mobius of lies and see it for what it actually is.

Rob it of all of its power and it will die and only you will be left.

Hoist on their own petard…

The switch that turned on the mainstream to ET and UFO’s is the Storm Area 51 Event. For those of us involved in this for the last decade and more, this was ludicrous, but not for the newbies.

There wasn’t one mainstream news outlet that didn’t report on this, bringing the ‘topic’ to many more people than ever before, even if it was a bit tongue-in-cheek, the rest of the world got to see just how many people were interested in this ‘topic of topics’.

On December 16th, 2017 the ‘official’ breaking news that nobody cared about – news from ‘official’ sources on ‘official’ documented reports, that only the UFO community understood the importance of was released – ahem…‘officially’. It had no real impact on the sleeping masses. So, IMO, a new more social media-ish tactic had to be taken to bring this topic into the greater awareness of ‘John Q. Public’.

Face Book. That’s all it took. Millions responded. It was even cancelled – then back on, then cancelled again, but, people still showed up. They had two Dutch gentlemen who actually got arrested – as if to say don’t do it, and still people showed up. Mostly it seems they all had fun, in the three venues they set up for an influx of how many, they had no idea. It seems this may become a yearly ‘thing’ like Burning Man, people are already ideating about it. This has become a significant place where a cultural revolution in its infancy has begun. Which means it will not be long before its infiltrated and turned to other purposes. (conspiracy101) Many have called this the ET Woodstock event of 2019 but unlike the original event on August 15th 1969, that took the powers-that-be by surprise, the powers are already on top of this and probably responsible for it.

They have used our grass roots peopleness through social media (their design) to produce an effect in our world culture that wasn’t moving fast enough to wake people up. The interesting question here is why? I think its karma that they have to undo all the giggle factor and fear tactics of almost a hundred years to get people to take this seriously – they are ending up having to clean up their very own mess. And it’s obvious they are working very hard at it. Again, the question is WHY?

When you wake up to the fact that the people of the world have had their perceptions adjusted for the last 2 to 3 thousand years, and you realize that all you can do is sit back and watch the games proceed, the instant fizzy karma that is happening now is just a tad gratifying. Ok, I’m not perfect…

Hoist on their own petard!

 

 

We are Beasts

About the alien autopsy (s), plural, because you find out from LMH’s Wednesday broadcast that she spoke with Ray Santilli, and Santilli directly interviewed “JB” who filmed not only the craft, but the Autopsy (s). Of the four bodies, one was alive, and one was the least damaged of the four and it was autopsied first. The ET that was live lived for two years, and upon it’s death, was autopsied in a large theater, with many watching and purportedly, Truman sat in on it.

In this broadcast Linda relays the interview Santilli was finally able to get from JB who wished to be anonymous. This makes my heart sick.

They waited until first light to even see to the bodies, which were alive, and crying out and in pain. When they did gather them up they had medical personnel look at them because they were so badly wounded. They then proceeded to tape and tie down these wounded people to transport them all the way from Sirocco, Mexico to Right Field in Dayton Ohio. This was in 1947, air travel then was slow. Imagine the agony those people felt – the actual physical pain, because you knew they were feeling it due to the crying that they could all hear even before they went into physical proximity to the craft. I personally wouldn’t let my dog suffer like that – much less tie and (!) tape him down for a 3 hour period while I got him to the doctor! And with the treatment they got, it isn’t hard to imagine that even then they were not given any empathic care or simple kindness.

Further one of the beings lived for two years after the event. Well, this is the one who was autopsied in 1949 in the large theater in front of many people and is where the extra information about what they found in the interior thoracic cavity and brain were garnered.

I am led to wonder if Sgt. Stone wasn’t one of the military personnel there because if you listen to any of his interviews about crash retrieval, he is always upset. I think I would be too if I had to wittness this inhumanity to any being at the hands of another human. LMH says she thinks and has heard that they were clones. Even if they were IT WAS OBVIOUS THEY WERE IN PAIN AND DISTRESS and nothing was done. Since when does a human being sit and watch another living being in agony and DO NOTHING ABOUT IT !?!? I also think that this is where we get the story of the alien being that was held somewhere that people have talked to and were scared of. ‘JB’ was scared enough to have needed to call them ‘freaks’ so he didn’t have to look at the fact that they were real, like he was, and maybe he was just as sickened by their treatment and needed to call them freaks so it didn’t seem so bad.

We are xenophobic, color phobic, disability phobic, body appearance phobic – for that matter we are phobic-phobic. The only thing this works for is war. War is a good excuse to go and wipeout anything you are phobic about… nobody seems to notice our phobias are weaponized and monetized… jus-say’in…

It’s a horrible thing to admit, to watch, and a terrible pill to swallow to think that this went on, not several times, but many and that we are so brutal. We are beasts. I am ashamed to be grouped in the ranks of those who would do something like this. Dr. Greer call them sociopaths. I think they are psychopaths – totally disconnected from humanity and any kind of human kindness. I think that may be why it is so easy to call the Santilli information and film a fake, because then we don’t have to admit that it happened.

So far the military have been the main mode of contact with other beings for 100 years. I would have quarantined this planet for another 100 years had I been in the visitors’ shoes. And yet they haven’t. There are CE5 programs out there Like Kosta Makreas’s and Steven Greer’s that have been going on for quite some time.

In the meantime, think about our role as beasts – think about if you would choose that role, think about the Alien-As-Bad Guy meme. I’m tired of it all. I’d like to think I might have grown beyond it. How about you?


Sgt. Clifford Stone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W_3aneRPOg&list=PL6sUc4cwrVTsL8e6P8NIvEHOmOA52Pj3E&index=2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK7xJ-qA_58&list=PL6sUc4cwrVTsL8e6P8NIvEHOmOA52Pj3E&index=5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC4t1FEk5LE&list=PL6sUc4cwrVTsL8e6P8NIvEHOmOA52Pj3E&index=16

 

Billy Carson just fires my brain!!

RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsaKSnWotIY

Ep. 1023 FADE to BLACK w/ Billy Carson P3 : Time is an Illusion : LIV

The Emerald tablets were Left Behind as a guideline for the teachers of the world to teach the people – they were never meant to be hidden or secret.

-me

Never..

(Billy Carson just fires my brain!!)

We are allowed to know. In fact, we are encouraged, nay required to know what is our birthright. Those tablets were meant to teach us and help us progress. As it is right now, we are like Romulus and Remus – children set at cast into the forest, wild wolves, with no real history and no real basis for the truth.

 

Time and Timelines: like Birkland Currents in the universe and in our brains

 

Could it be that time lines interweave with each other braid and come apart and braid with other timelines and come apart and each time that happens people of a certain frequency who have changed their frequency and learned jump over to time lines that are touching that are more similar to their own frequency?

 

Can this mean that we are constantly jumping timelines as our own frequency changes?

 

Could it be that it takes a certain number of souls all on the same frequency to actualize a time line for all of humanity, like a quorum?  And by jumping to those timelines where like frequencies exist together, the more people you have on a certain time line the more actualized it becomes ?  The more real?  ( like the hundredth monkey effect – morphic resonance, the tipping point ). Maybe because the more people that join the time line the more real it will become for humanity and what we are seeing are decision points that build enough resonance to actually change the outcome of humanity?  That when enough of these come together the overall direction of humanity can then change? And the rest of humanity is simply dragged along?   Which leads to the next idea that the Mandela  effect may be what we have Left Behind to become who we are today?

This looks very much like Birkland currents in electric universe theory. And very like Bohm’s resonance theory.

 

As above: So below

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Science and Spirit: tricky words

The words spirit and spiritual are terms used to identify almost anything unseen. Jung brings up a good point about their usage in a lecture delivered to the literary Society of Augsburg, 20 October 1926, on the theme of “Nature and Spirit”:

The connection between spirit and life is one of those problems involving factors of such complexity that we have to be on our guard lest we ourselves get caught in the net of words in which we seek to ensnare these great enigmas. For how can we bring into the orbit of our thought those limitless complexities of life which we call “Spirit” or “Life” unless we clothe them in verbal concepts, themselves mere counters of the intellect? The mistrust of verbal concepts, inconvenient as it is, nevertheless seems to me to be very much in place in speaking of fundamentals. “Spirit” and “Life” are familiar enough words to us, very old acquaintances in fact, pawns that for thousands of years have been pushed back and forth on the thinker’s chessboard. The problem must have begun in the grey dawn of time, when someone made the bewildering discovery that the living breath which left the body of the dying man in the last death-rattle meant more than just air in motion. It can scarcely be an accident onomatopoeic words like ruach (Hebrew), ruch (Arabic), roho (Swahili) mean ‘spirit’ no less clearly than πνεύμα (pneuma, Greek) and spiritus (Latin).[13]

 


The unseen world exists or we would not have all the words for it we do. I know the following is lengthy, not only to illustrate how it all gets lumped up and interchanged, but also in effort to find words for in ineffable, the unseen, but felt and known. The language itself enfolds proof for the unseen. These terms are as old as the roots of our languages are.


spir·it

/ˈspirit/

noun

noun: spirit; plural noun: spirits

Spirit – Latin

Breath, breathing; breeze, air; inspiration; character; arrogance

From <http://latindictionary.wikidot.com/noun:spiritus>

 

Spirit – Etymology

The English word “spirit” comes from the Latin spiritus,but also “spirit, soul, courage, vigor”, ultimately from a Proto-Indo-European *(s)peis. It is distinguished from Latin anima, “soul” (which nonetheless also derives from an Indo-European root meaning “to breathe”, earliest form *h2enh1-).[4] In Greek, this distinction exists between pneuma (πνεῦμα), “breath, motile air, spirit,” and psykhē (ψυχή), “soul”[1

From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit>

 

Definitions

Spirit:

the nonphysical part of a person which is the seat of emotions and character; the soul.
“we seek a harmony between body and spirit”

synonyms: soul, psyche, inner self, inner being, essential being; More

pneuma;

anima, ego, id;

ka;

atman

“we seek a harmony between body and spirit”

antonyms: body, flesh

the nonphysical part of a person regarded as their true self and as capable of surviving physical death or separation.
“a year after he left, his spirit is still present”

synonyms: life force, animating principle, vital spark, breath of life;

élan vital

“the spirit of nature”

the nonphysical part of a person manifested as an apparition after their death; a ghost.

synonyms: ghost, phantom, specter, apparition, wraith, shadow, presence; More

bodach; Doppelgänger; duppy; spook; phantasm, shade, revenant, visitant, wight; eidolon, manes

“local people say that his spirit walks among the hills”

a supernatural being. “shrines to nature spirits”   short for Holy Spirit.

those qualities regarded as forming the definitive or typical elements in the character of a person, nation, or group or in the thought and attitudes of a particular period.
“the university is a symbol of the nation’s egalitarian spirit”

synonyms: ethos, prevailing tendency, motivating force, animating principle, dominating characteristic, essence, quintessence; More

atmosphere, mood, feeling, temper, tenor, climate;

attitudes, beliefs, principles, standards, ethics

“the spirit of the nineteenth century”

a person identified with their most prominent mental or moral characteristics or with their role in a group or movement.   “he was a leading spirit in the conference”

a specified emotion or mood, especially one prevailing at a particular time. “I hope the team will build on this spirit of confidence” a person’s mood.
the attitude or intentions with which someone undertakes or regards something. “he confessed in a spirit of self-respect, not defiance”

synonyms: temperament, disposition, character, nature, personality, temper, makeup, humor, cast/turn of mind, complexion;

mind, heart “this thought dampened even my optimistic spirit”

attitude, frame of mind, way of thinking, way of looking at it, state of mind, point of view, outlook, thoughts, ideas   “she’s got the right spirit”

mood, frame of mind, state of mind, emotional state, humor, temper   “she was in good spirits when I left”

the quality of courage, energy, and determination or assertiveness. “his visitors admired his spirit and good temper”

synonym: morale, team spirit; esprit de corps “the spirit of the team is high”

courage, bravery, courageousness, braveness, pluck, pluckiness, valor, strength of character, fortitude, backbone, spine, mettle, stout-heartedness, determination, firmness of purpose, resolution, resoluteness, resolve, fight, gameness; guts, grit, spunk; bottle; sand, moxie animation, enthusiasm, eagerness, keenness, liveliness, vivacity, vivaciousness, energy, verve, vigor, dynamism, zest, dash, elan, panache, sparkle, exuberance, gusto, brio, pep, go, sap, fervor, zeal, fire, passion; pizzazz, oomph, zing, zip, zap, vim, get-up-and-go

 

the real meaning or the intention behind something as opposed to its strict verbal interpretation. “the rule had been broken in spirit if not in letter”

synonyms: real/true meaning, true intention, essence, substance

“we must be seen to keep to the spirit of the law as well as the letter”

British – strong distilled liquor such as brandy, whiskey, gin, or rum.

synonyms: strong liquor, liquor, strong drink; More

gin, vodka, whiskey, brandy, rum; shorts, firewater, hooch

 

a volatile liquid, especially a fuel, prepared by distillation. “aviation spirit”

archaic
a solution of volatile components extracted from something, typically by distillation or by solution in alcohol. “spirits of turpentine” a highly refined substance or fluid thought to govern vital phenomena.

 

Spiritual – Metaphysical terms

An incorporeal but ubiquitous, non-quantifiable substance or energy present individually in all living things. Unlike the concept of souls (often regarded as eternal and sometimes believed to pre-exist the body) a spirit develops and grows as an integral aspect of a living being.[9]

 

From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit>


Then we have the word Science which comes from Latin and means:

 

sci·ence

Latin – Scire

To know, understand http://latindictionary.wikidot.com/verb:scir

noun: science

the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
“the world of science and technology”

synonyms: branch of knowledge, body of knowledge/information/facts, area of study, discipline, field “the science of criminology”

a particular area of science.

Archaic – knowledge of any kind.
“his rare science and his practical skill”


The thought of the day is that science and spirituality, or spirit are not opposites, like todays general idea of them would have you think. And science doesn’t just study the physical side of life, it also studies the energetic, or spirit side of life too. (air is unseeable so are may gasses, not to mention the quantum side of things or what we do with sound….etc.) So this current idea of a split between science and spirit and not being able to use science to study, describe or quantify spirit is irrational. It is also a piece of programming that has held back the study of things unseen for about two thousand years (except in some circles) and stunted our knowledge base on purpose.

Science can study spirit the same as it studies all other matters and in some circles it has, thus we have our breakaway civilizations, and secret societies and mystery schools. Knowledge is power, and until the Guttenberg press was invented, regular society never even knew what the bible said. Now with the internet, we all have the opportunity to know anything…except those facts that science has discovered about spirit.

So my next question would be WHY? The only answer I have been able to come up with is that it would equalize the world too much such that those in power wouldn’t be able to stay in power. When you listen to fellows like Joe McMoneagle talk (who swears we are all spiritually endowed) and Russell Targ, or Rupert Sheldrake or Stewart Hameroff you realize there have been some real trailblazers out there as of late. Then you listen to people like Garry Nolan (who is working with Kit Green et al) in an interview on Phenomenon Radio try so very hard to use the ‘correct’ words to describe the intersect between spirit and science and his research in order not to incur the wrath of ‘normal science professionals’ and, well, I feel very sorry for the man. It’s obvious that he has such a passion for the research and yet, like Jung said in the paragraph above, the words become a tangle and a weapon which could be turned back against him if he is not scrupulous with them. Yet, you hear the passion he has for his work, and his hopes and expectations in the tone of his voice that says as much if not more than his words – all aspects of the unseen and spirit…

You see my point? It’s not so much what the unseen is, as it is that we have been taught that we mustn’t ever, ever, ever look at it square in the face. (but what is more fun than sticking your nose in where is doesn’t belong??? Lol)

Whether is it timing (the procession of the earth and the Yugas) or it is knowledge (the availability of information) causing a tipping point, the intervention of cosmic forces (ET’s, ID’s and the like, both benevolent and malevolent: bene-good mal-bad) or all of the above, the tipping point has been reached. But instead of only one direction, there are many, and when this is through, this opening up, it will be billions of directions, not just one, creating a singularity of unimagined proportions that will truly become the new human – the new identity that when we look back on this world, it will seem only a tiny grain of sand in a whole new ocean.

We don’t have the words, but we soon will. The question is, will we still need them, words, that is?

The only ultimate power there really is…

What would it feel like to be telepathic in a room full of fools?

What would it feel like to be telepathic in a room full of psychopaths? Or maybe just a few?

What does is feel like to walk into a bar of drunk ppl stone cold sober and stay that way?

What does it feel like to have all your teenagers and their friends together for a sleepover and you are the responsible adult?

What if that room that everybody’s stuck in is a virtual room?

When you are listening to a pod cast, a show host, you know how there is always something in the voice that conveys way more than just what is being said – like you can sus out how they are physically and emotionally?

Take that once more removed and use only words to do the sussing. Now that we have twitter and chat rooms attached to videos and pod casts, we have a community of people that come together with their minds in a virtual room on one topic. We create a virtual meeting space that exists for the time of the event, however, sometimes this virtual room/meeting space continues for some time afterwards. We have all learned to convey our thoughts and feelings pretty succinctly in words/type/print over the last few years since this phenomena began and this makes the experience even more cohesive. Now imagine that this type of communication is very like telepathy, in that we don’t have to all be in the same place physically and we are all communicating all sorts of ideas to each other along with our feelings.

Then bring in this idea we have discussed about people feeling way more brazen about saying over the internet things that go way beyond the pale into rudeness and downright idiocy – all because the person they are saying it to is not standing in front of them ready to punch their lights out. Factor in that the respective emotional age of those people is between 5 years and 8 years old. Then factor in the reasons people stir the pot – for attention etc.… and you have a perfect recipe for kindergarten behavior and the need for naps and cookies. (throw in some thumb sucking and a soft blankie or two – you get the picture) and don’t forget, kindergartners don’t deal very well with grey areas – they want things like; yes – no, black-white, belief or hate ad nauseum. Their tolerance for indiscriminate, open ended ideas and constructive questioning and debate is zero. If you give them the fantasy they will believe it until an authority figure tells them, like mom or dad, that Santa Clause isn’t real. Metaphor is NOT one of their strong points.

Now place all of this into the category of real telepathy, where by rule of polite conduct you don’t barge in on others unless you follow those rules and imagine the above. Imagine what a head ache those who refuse to follow even a polite ethic in virtual reality would be in a real reality where there was organic telepathy, and you will know WHY organic telepathy is not a planet-wide ability like breathing or seeing… yet. (or imagine being in that bar fully sober and be glad you can walk out at any time…)

It has been said often that the internet is practice for if-and-when real telepathy becomes a fact. I KNOW there are those of us out there who would fling themselves off the planet just to get away from the zoo that would be. But if telepathy is a quantum entangled state (lol) it wouldn’t matter how far you went, you would still be in the middle of it – if you chose to listen. If you chose to notice…

I’m almost sorry I dipped my big toe into this mess yesterday, except in struggling to understand the why it all happened, I’ve learned a lesson. I hate suffering. I don’t care if some people think it’s the only way we grow. I still hate it. I hate pain, causing it or having it. Yes, sometimes we have to have it to learn or to alter our behavior maybe to save our lives. I still hate it. And…I would do–no-harm if I could help it. And sometimes I can’t. And yet, in cases like the falderal that has been going on, it also has to be sorted. Sorted for understanding, sorted to stop the damage, sorted to learn from it, sorted for prevention…sorted. And to those who have done the sorting and to those who got caught in the falderal, I salute you. You have my sympathy and admiration for your courage.

Pathology is always hard to understand and assess fast enough to catch it before destruction happens because most people are nice and because they are the unsuspecting victims of bad behavior. Once again we have pain on both sides because the perp’s bad behavior is born from the roots of pain and the unsuspecting are not ready for what is coming at them. There are consequences for both. The perp is found out and must be accountable for the action, the victim learns not to be so innocent in a world that will crush that light out of them.

And once again we are faced with choice. Choice before action, choice before thought, choice before emotional response. Choice comes out of an ethic and empathy. You are an adult because you can choose at a creative, ethical level. Children cannot – they want absolutes. Those who can choose have a gift in the awareness of that choice.

Because, choice is the only ultimate power there really is.

And there is always a choice to be found in everything.

And for some strange reason this little planet seems to be where you go to learn it.

 

Consciousness IS the unified field: or Don’t Worry, Be Happy

…it’s not about neg. or pos. or happy or sad, it’s about the inevitable march forward of our conscious awareness…

-ABell

I would love to see science prove what we know in our inner heart. However, the schizophrenic split between science and consciousness – the world of the seen and unseen, has been weaponized. And of course, it’s on purpose. But we have a defense…

Once again, I was listening to the recent interview dropped by Natasha Nyxx with Grant Cameron. Grant seems to be the only person willing to be open about the real truth at the moment. Everybody else will tell you a tid bit – but that is all – whether they know the whole story or just tid bits… I listen a lot, to an eclectic selection all with one theme, that of the consciousness thread running through it. From Richard Dolan and Joseph Farrell, to the Dean Radins of the world, through Gordon White. I have blogged about the necessity for cross disciplinary studies from the quantum super position to psychology, parapsychology and religious perspectives. Everybody has their own ‘name’ for these things but they are talking about the same thing. Why? Because it really is the same thing.

The visible-invisible split has been used to cage the human experience. I have written about the biggest psy-op in the world and this is it. Our minds have been messed with – really badly messed with. We have been taught to use only one part of our wholeness. We are schizophrenic.

Otherwise, were we to know our wholeness our unity, we would realize this world and ourselves much differently. But, we have a defense. There is something called the hundredth monkey effect, the morphogenic resonance. It doesn’t just happen with monkeys on an island. I watched this happen back in the 60’s much to my dismay over gemstones. Back in the day there was a place in the ‘burbs of Chicago, called the Lizzadro Museum of Lapidary art. It was in my neighborhood and mom and I and my sis used to go there just to look at their amazing displays. They had a gift shop where you could buy polished, faceted stones which every time we went – we got to buy some. They were cheap. I still have several pieces that I made back then that are lovely. I could afford them. Then enter Shirley MacLaine and the first main stream book ever written about a modern day awakening. She wrote about quartz crystals and the use of other gem stones to heighten states of consciousness and voila’! The price of quartz points quadrupled overnight. I was furious and felt cheated. I had bought them all my life – I was a rock hound, and suddenly I couldn’t afford to even look at them, much less purchase them.

Before Shirley MacLaine’s foray into consciousness raising, if you talked to anybody about auras, crystals, or meditation in mid-western Illinois, people thought you were crazy, FUBAR and gave you a wide berth plus the evil eye. Then in less than a year everything Shirley talked about was like, ‘Yeah, vibes, crystals, meditation, auras – I knew all about that’ and if you asked them how they learned it, to the last person they all said, ‘I just Know.’ like they woke up one day with it all inside their heads, while the few of us into this line of thinking had been struggling against the current for years.

That, my friends, is the hundredth monkey effect in the everyday people world.

Back in the seventies just try to tell a scientist or academic about information popping into the subconscious meta-culture of the people like magic and they would have simply sneered at you and sent you on your way. I know, I had it happen – lots. Bring it up today and you quite possibly would get a lecture on quantum super position… jus say’in.

So.

From my point of view, I see the world already in a great state of progress. The more of us forerunners that can understand and progress, the more this consciousness raising can happen. Day after day as the real-reality is apprehended and understood the raising of the whole is being done. We, the forerunners, who have been rolling that rock uphill against the wind on an icy slope are making this possible. I have seen this happen for the last forty years – once I understood the principle. All of a sudden a little new awareness creeps into the hearts and minds of the masses and becomes a claimed ‘I-always-knew-that’ fact. When you ask them how they knew that, they can’t pin point it – just that – well, now that I think about it, I always knew that

This all relates back the Grant Cameron’s assertion that if you want to know about the answer to the UFO question, you have to understand consciousness. I have been saying for years that:

Consciousness IS the unified field.

What Grant says about downloads and contact modalities is correct too, from my point of view, because my first contact/download/telepathic experience was at 5 years old and brought on by extreme distress and yelling a question to god or whomever was out there and getting a full sensory/experiential answer that I remember 60 years later in total context. And it was all about love and unity, understanding and compassion. And I was only 5. It so profoundly changed my life, so totally colored my perspective that just about everything I did linked back to it. The experience simultaneously saved my life and my five year old heart and opened me to the rest of what came next in my life.

The lynch pin to the whole mess is Consciousness. Well, that and understanding that we already have a consciousness and part of that is connected to everything, everywhere, every time and yes, we still have to live it out here and share what we know to lovingly bring every other consciousness up in awareness and understanding that it is all – we are all inextricably connected, interwoven by this life force called consciousness.

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

Of Cages

The fights we are seeing going on right now echo two things in my mind, well maybe three.
1. the dark magic is reminiscent of the Jack Parsons/Crowley/Hubbard stuff from the 1940’s repeating and the magical alchemy of money BMMS (lol – Babylonian Money Magic System) (2)

2. the ‘two groups fighting resemble the light and the dark brotherhoods of the mystery schools (who believe it or not folks are being controlled by this larger force such that they are both too busy to see that third force)

3. this all kinda goes back to the survivors of the great cosmic war when they blew up a planet, wound up here and have never stopped creating MESS. (of which number two is only the latest iteration)

The cult mentality of all of it is even more concerning. Information on cults:

Humans desire comfort, and in a fearful and uncertain world many turn to cults because they tend to promote exactly that. Jon-Patrik Pedersen, a psychologist at CalTech, has pointed out that cult leaders often make promises that are totally unattainable, but also offered by no other group in society. Such things might include financial security, total health, constant peace of mind, and eternal life — the things every human desires at the deepest level. (savior mentality)

Cults satisfy the human desire for absolute answers.

Those with low self-esteem are more likely to be persuaded by a cult environment.

New recruits are “love bombed.”

Women are more likely than men to join a cult.

Many cult members have rejected religion.

Cults maintain their power by promoting an “us vs. them” mentality.

Cult leaders are masters at mind control.

Ways in which leaders gain control over cult members vary, but some popular methods include:

Public Humiliation: New cult members may be “love bombed” shortly after their arrival, but once they are established members, cult leaders often maintain emotional control through various exercises meant to publicly humiliate a member. One such method involves someone sitting in a chair surrounded by other members, at which time they are required to admit their recent failures, base thoughts, shortcomings, etc.

Self-Incrimination: A favorite tactic of the infamous cult leader Jim Jones, self-incrimination requires cult members to provide their leader with written statements detailing their individual fears and mistakes. The cult leader can then use these statements to shame individual members publicly.

Brainwashing: Cult leaders are known to repeat various lies and distortions until members find it difficult to distinguish between reality and cult life.

Paranoia: To maintain a false sense of comfort, cults often rely on paranoia tactics. Cult leaders convince their victims that a group, their families, and/or the government is out to get them, but that the cult can provide safety. Once a cult member comes to the conclusion that their families and country cannot keep them safe, they begin to worship and put all of their faith in their cult leader. Jim Jones was especially skilled at this mind-control trick. He would encourage members to spy on each other, and consistently spoke through loudspeakers at all hours of the day so that cult members would hear his voice whether awake or asleep.

Cult members often have no idea they’re in a cult.

Cult life can have a dangerous and lasting effect.

He specifically mentions that the “symptoms of temporal lobe epilepsy are similar to those seen or reported as resulted from cult conversions:

increased irritability

loss of libido or altered sexual interest

ritualism

compulsive attention to detail

mystical states

humorlessness and sobriety

heightened paranoia

From <https://www.onlinepsychologydegree.info/what-to-know-about-the-psychology-of-cults/>

In case you choose to say, ‘Not Me’…

Before jumping into the specifics, I’d like to briefly discuss an insidious psychological process called the “Self-serving Bias.” This bias leads us to believe that we are immune to the influences that affect the rest of humanity. I run into this bias all the time when describing my work on resistance to persuasion: “I think it’s great that you’re trying to help people resist television ads. Of course, TV ads don’t persuade me…”

The self-serving bias has been demonstrated countless times: the majority of Americans believe they are smarter and better looking than average; most drivers (even those hospitalized for accidents) believe themselves more skilled than the average driver; most smog-breathing Los Angelinos believe themselves healthier than their neighbors; most college students believe they will outlive their predicted age of death by 10 years, and so on.

The most ironic example of the self-serving bias that I’ve ever heard appeared in a social psychology paper written by one of Kelton’s students. After the self-serving bias had been discussed in class, this student wrote:

“I don’t understand why they say the self-serving bias is universal. I mean, I see it in other people, but I personally don’t have a self-serving bias.”

I’m not kidding, the student really wrote that!

From <http://www.workingpsychology.com/cultdef.html>
What do you do with information you want to have hidden and keep hidden? You swear those who know to secrecy with ideas like the destruction of mankind because mankind cannot handle the power and importance of this information and you hide it behind mystery schools. (1) This causes the information to land in two select groups. One that will have a moral and ethical bent towards the greatest good, and one that will keep and use the information for their own advancement (breakaways and ppl like those who run CERN and HARRP)
IMO we are looking at a worldwide psy-op (cult) that nobody really knows the full extent of, with even the mystery schools, prominent and excellent researchers, governments and alphabet soups and all the others being played as useful-idiots.

We are all being played.

When the

‘…only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.’

is the only thing we can be sure of, then the world is operating as one giant cult.
And instead of recognizing this most people are acting like captives in a cage scrambling for the biggest scraps that land through the bars, while diligent souls who have real information are drowned out by insignificant and useful idiots such that the mass confusion creates its own control system. Problem solved for the cage tenders.
OMG!!!
(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m2Qvh85QBY&list=PLNfJkzByQRux01gvudalzEGUgoH496qay

(2) https://youtu.be/r3-wlD8LOM4BMMS